Truth or Consequences? The Inadequacy of Consequentialist Arguments Against Multicultural Relativism: a review essay of: Beyond all reason: the radical assault on truth in American law. By Daniel Farber & Suzanna Sherry.
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Truth or Consequences? The Inadequacy of Consequentialist Arguments Against Multicultural Relativism: a review essay of: Beyond all reason: the radical assault on truth in American law. By Daniel Farber & Suzanna Sherry.
Authors
Published Date
1998
Publisher
University of Minnesota Law School
Type
Article
Abstract
Truth or Consequences? The Inadequacy of Consequentialist Arguments Against Multicultural Relativism: a review essay of: Beyond all reason: the radical assault on truth in American law. By Daniel Farber & Suzanna Sherry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
1997. Pp. 208.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Constitutional Commentary, Volume 15, Number 1 (Spring 1998), pages 185-208.
Suggested citation
Hills, Roderick M., Jr.. (1998). Truth or Consequences? The Inadequacy of Consequentialist Arguments Against Multicultural Relativism: a review essay of: Beyond all reason: the radical assault on truth in American law. By Daniel Farber & Suzanna Sherry.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/167633.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.