“Democratizing” clinical research? efficiency and inclusiveness in an electronic primary care research network

Loading...

View/Download File

Hudson_umn_0130E_11156.pdf (3.55 MB)

Persistent link to this item

http://purl.umn.edu/93923

Statistics

View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

“Democratizing” clinical research? efficiency and inclusiveness in an electronic primary care research network

Authors

Hudson, Brenda L.

Published Date

2010-06

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

This dissertation is a critical ethnography and rhetorical study of the development of an electronic network designed to advance medical research and improve health. Specifically, this study focuses on the network's social and technological affordances of efficiency and inclusiveness to connect communities of primary care providers and clinical researchers to both expand participation in and expedite the research process. By examining the network's technical elements aligned with its social context, the assumptions that influence the choice of technologies, and the network's subsequent design, Brenda L. Hudson explores the network's hierarchical structure and potential democratizing capabilities in clinical research. Through field notes, interviews, and textual analysis, Hudson provides a micro-level examination of the electronic network's development and technical affordances during the program's three-year funded contract. An ethnographic narrative describes how the group functions as a "community of practice" to create a network linking primary care practices with clinical research. Further, Hudson provides a macro-level examination that draws on critical theories of technology and explores to what extent the network might serve as a "democratic" technology through its involvement of previously unprivileged populations in clinical research--primary care providers and patients. Results indicate that assumptions of efficiency and inclusiveness in clinical research--and specifically in the network's technical affordances--provide potential benefits to patients' health by widening the pool of researchers and participants and streamlining the recruitment process. However, manifest in this electronic network, these assumptions also pose potential risks and ethical challenges surrounding private health information and "therapeutic misconception," whereby a research participant believes that enrolling in a research study will provide direct therapeutic benefit. Further results indicate that although the development team has done much to assure a "democratic" development of use of technology by operating as a "community of practice," there exist unintentional asymmetrical hierarchies of who controls and uses the network, favoring primary care providers and practices that already exist in clinical research.

Keywords

Clinical research

Communities of practice

Electronic network

Ethnography

Rhetoric

Technical communication

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. June 2010. Major: Rhetoric and Scientific and Technical Communication. Advisor: Carol Berkenkotter, Ph.D., 1 computer file (PDF); v, 276 pages, appenduices A-B.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Dissertations

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Hudson, Brenda L.. (2010). “Democratizing” clinical research? efficiency and inclusiveness in an electronic primary care research network. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/93923.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.