Financial reporting comparability and relative performance evaluation
2016-06
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Financial reporting comparability and relative performance evaluation
Authors
Published Date
2016-06
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
There is limited large-sample empirical evidence in the U.S. that CEO compensation contracts use the accounting performance of peer firms as a benchmark to evaluate the CEO’s own-firm accounting performance (i.e., accounting-based relative performance evaluation, RPE). Given the anecdotal and empirical observation that firms do use their own accounting numbers in determining CEO compensation, the lack of evidence of accounting-based RPE presents a puzzle. My study questions whether the lack of evidence is attributable to a limitation of the conventional empirical research design used to test for RPE. I propose that efficient relative evaluation using peer-firm accounting performance requires that the peer firm has a comparable financial reporting system. Thus, I refine the selection of the peer group by matching the firm of interest with industry-size peer firms with high financial reporting comparability. I find strong empirical evidence of accounting-based RPE in determining CEO’s total compensation when financial reporting comparability is taken into account in peer selection. Consistent with expectations, I also find that accounting-based RPE is used more in determining cash compensation than equity compensation and its use increases in the fraction of CEO cash compensation to total compensation. I further find that, when the fraction of equity compensation declined during the recent financial crisis, the use of own-firm stock returns and price-based RPE in determining CEO’s total compensation declined as expected, but the use of own-firm accounting performance and accounting-based RPE continued to be significant. Overall, my results resolve the apparent inconsistency between the substantial anecdotal evidence and the lack of prior empirical support for accounting-based RPE in determining CEO compensation in the U.S.
Description
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. June 2016. Major: Business Administration. Advisor: Pervin Shroff. 1 computer file (PDF); v, 49 pages.
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Suggested citation
Nam, Jonathan. (2016). Financial reporting comparability and relative performance evaluation. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/182168.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.