Examining Technology Integration Practices and Beliefs of Grades 1-3 Teachers: A Case Study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Examining Technology Integration Practices and Beliefs of Grades 1-3 Teachers: A Case Study

Published Date

2018-12

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

This study examined how technology integration beliefs and practices of first and second grade teachers impacted their respective teaching practices. Technology is becoming more deeply integrated into US public school curricula, and it is therefore helpful to understand how teacher beliefs might affect how technology gets used within teaching practices, especially in the early primary grades. While belief systems are of critical importance to a teacher’s technology integration efforts and can pose a barrier to technology integration (Ertmer, Ottenbreit-Lefwich, Sadik, Sendurer, & Sendurer 2012; Funkhouser & Mouza, 2013; Lin, 2012; Liu, 2012), the impact of those belief systems is not well understood. Furthermore, P-12 educational research literature may be underrepresenting grades 1-3, and so this research strives to also be pragmatically useful for teachers and district administrators. An exploratory case study (Stake, 1995; Merriam, 1998) was conducted with three current teachers in grades 1-3 to obtain new insights on how these beliefs manifest in current classrooms to address three research questions: (1) What are the experiences of grades 1-3 teachers trying to integrate technology? (2) What beliefs do grades 1-3 teachers have, connected to technology integration? (3) What other factors affect how a grades 1-3 teacher integrates technology? With a case being defined as each individual teacher, this qualitative case study collected data through initial interviews, naturalistic observations, and follow up interviews. Analysis consisted of values coding and theming the data (Saldana, 2016) to identify six themes: (1) Pedagogy and focus on students wherein teachers’ consistent primary focus was on meeting students’ needs and engaging them in learning experiences, both with and without technology; (2) Technology knowledge that facilitated the use or avoidance of technology; (3) Technology as a barrier when design failures created problems for students; (4) School as ecosystem, as students have needs seemingly disconnected from formal classroom learning but that impact their learning experiences; (5) Teachers’ needs that, when left unmet created barriers to technology integration; and (6) Change management, especially in regards to stakeholders’ apprenticeship of observation (Lortie, 1975), made innovative uses of technology and pedagogy more difficult to implement. Insights gained from this research were used to make recommendations for addressing issues in each of the six themes to be used by teachers, district administrations, and education research as foundations in their own contexts. Future directions for this research include laying the foundations for a new model of technology integration for teachers.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. December 2018. Major: Education, Curriculum and Instruction. Advisor: Aaron Doering. 1 computer file (PDF); viii, 156 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Schwartz, Derek. (2018). Examining Technology Integration Practices and Beliefs of Grades 1-3 Teachers: A Case Study. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/202139.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.