Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

The Constitution Is Not "Hard Law": The Bork Rejection and the Future of Constitutional Jurisprudence.

Chemerinsky, Erwin
1989
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

06_01_Symposium_Chemerinsky.pdf (438.55 KB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/165118
Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

The Constitution Is Not "Hard Law": The Bork Rejection and the Future of Constitutional Jurisprudence.

Authors

Published Date

1989

Publisher

University of Minnesota Law School

Type

Article

Abstract

Keywords

Description

Part of a symposium on "the Constitution as hard law" at a meeting of the Association of American Law Schools in Miami.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 06, Issue 1 (Winter 1989)

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 6, Number 1 (Winter 1989), pages 29-38.

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Chemerinsky, Erwin. (1989). The Constitution Is Not "Hard Law": The Bork Rejection and the Future of Constitutional Jurisprudence.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/165118.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.