Assessing Advocacy Grantmaking: a Case Study of the Sheltering Arms Foundation
Loading...
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Assessing Advocacy Grantmaking: a Case Study of the Sheltering Arms Foundation
Alternative title
Published Date
2009-12-15
Publisher
Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
University of Minnesota Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs students Julia
Zhu, Robin Smothers and Siarhei Lisichonak worked with Sheltering Arms Foundation to
assess the organization’s advocacy grantmaking practices and outcomes.
After interviewing several of the foundation’s grantees, conducting a survey on similar
foundations, reviewing existing literature on advocacy, advocacy grantmaking and
advocacy grantmaking evaluation, the group concluded that Sheltering Arms’ advocacy
grantmaking strategy could benefit greatly from including a more formalized evaluation
in several parts of the grant process.
Keywords
Description
Professional paper for the fulfillment of the Master of Public Policy degree
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Lisichonak, Siarhei, Robin Smothers, Julia Zhu. Assessing Advocacy Grantmaking: a Case Study of the Sheltering Arms Foundation. 15 Dec 2009. Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs. Master of Public Policy.
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Lisichonak, Siarhei; Smothers, Robin; Zhu, Julia. (2009). Assessing Advocacy Grantmaking: a Case Study of the Sheltering Arms Foundation. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/55745.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.