James Collins' "Louis Lavelle on Human Participation" (1947), and Walter J. Ong's Thought

No Thumbnail Available

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

James Collins' "Louis Lavelle on Human Participation" (1947), and Walter J. Ong's Thought

Alternative title

Published Date

2022-09

Publisher

This version was not previously published.

Type

Scholarly Text or Essay

Abstract

In my 1,650-word review essay "James Collins' 'Louis Lavelle on Human Participation' (1947), and Walter J. Ong's Thought," I highlight, on the one hand, the work of the American Jesuit Renaissance specialist and cultural historian Walter Jackson Ong (1912-2003; Ph.D. in English, Harvard University, 1955), and, on the other hand, the work of the American Catholic philosopher James Daniel Collins (1917-1985; Ph.D. in philosophy, Catholic University of America, 1944). In Ong's massively researched 1958 book Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue (Harvard University Press), which Collins reviewed, Ong works with the aural-to-visual shift in Western cultural history. Ong based his account of the aural-to-visual shift of the French Christian existentialist philosopher Louis Lavelle's 1942 book. In 1947, Collins published his article "Louis Lavelle on Human Participation."

Description

See the above abstract.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

N/A;N/A

Funding information

N/A

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

This version was not previously published.

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Farrell, Thomas. (2022). James Collins' "Louis Lavelle on Human Participation" (1947), and Walter J. Ong's Thought. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/241471.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.