James Collins' "Louis Lavelle on Human Participation" (1947), and Walter J. Ong's Thought
2022-09
No Thumbnail Available
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
James Collins' "Louis Lavelle on Human Participation" (1947), and Walter J. Ong's Thought
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
2022-09
Publisher
This version was not previously published.
Type
Scholarly Text or Essay
Abstract
In my 1,650-word review essay "James Collins' 'Louis Lavelle on Human Participation' (1947), and Walter J. Ong's Thought," I highlight, on the one hand, the work of the American Jesuit Renaissance specialist and cultural historian Walter Jackson Ong (1912-2003; Ph.D. in English, Harvard University, 1955), and, on the other hand, the work of the American Catholic philosopher James Daniel Collins (1917-1985; Ph.D. in philosophy, Catholic University of America, 1944). In Ong's massively researched 1958 book Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue (Harvard University Press), which Collins reviewed, Ong works with the aural-to-visual shift in Western cultural history. Ong based his account of the aural-to-visual shift of the French Christian existentialist philosopher Louis Lavelle's 1942 book. In 1947, Collins published his article "Louis Lavelle on Human Participation."
Description
See the above abstract.
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
N/A;N/A
Funding information
N/A
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
This version was not previously published.
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Farrell, Thomas. (2022). James Collins' "Louis Lavelle on Human Participation" (1947), and Walter J. Ong's Thought. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/241471.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.