Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Associational protection and potential non-target effects of systemic insecticide treatments against emerald ash borer

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Associational protection and potential non-target effects of systemic insecticide treatments against emerald ash borer

Published Date

2022-03

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis, is an invasive beetle that was accidentally introduced to North America from Asia. In North America, EAB attacks and kills ash trees (Fraxinus spp.). Since the 1990s the insect has spread to 35 American states and 5 Canadian provinces. A primary management strategy against EAB in urban centers is the use of systemic insecticide treatments. However, insecticide application can be very costly and induces concern about potential non-target effects on other invertebrate species and the environment. The objectives of this dissertation were to investigate the use of a treatment regime that could reduce costs, amounts of insecticides, and potential indirect negative effects on ash trees and other invertebrates. We hypothesized that treating a subset of ash trees in an urban setting could confer protective benefits to untreated trees, a strategy known as associational protection. We set up a study from summers 2017 to 2021 where 50% of boulevard ash trees at twelve sites distributed across eight cities in central and southeastern Minnesota were treated in a spatial gradient with one of two insecticides: emamectin benzoate (TREE-äge® G4) or azadirachtin (AzaSol®). Each site covered an area of approximately 1 km2 and contained approximately 100 ash trees. In general, treating a subset of trees increased the overall crown health of the study trees. We also conducted field and laboratory studies to analyze the indirect effect of insecticides on ash tree phenology and seed resources as well as non-target effects on other insect species. No adverse effects of chemical treatments were observed on ash tree phenology or seed germination or viability or time to germination. Non-target insect studies showed that there will likely be minimal effects on other invertebrates. Results from this study will assist in amending current treatment regimens using systemic insecticides and elucidate potential risks these insecticides may have on non-target invertebrates and ash trees.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. March 2022. Major: Entomology. Advisor: Brian Aukema. 1 computer file (PDF); xix 216 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Mwangola, Dorah. (2022). Associational protection and potential non-target effects of systemic insecticide treatments against emerald ash borer. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/227911.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.