Methods and species for conversion of Kentucky bluegrass rough to no-mow, low-input turfgrass areas
2013-01
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Methods and species for conversion of Kentucky bluegrass rough to no-mow, low-input turfgrass areas
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
2013-01
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
With golf course water, fertilizer, and pesticide restrictions on the rise and labor
costs continuing to increase, golf course superintendents are looking for ways to reduce
maintained Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) rough. The objective of this study was
to (i) compare several methods for converting Kentucky bluegrass roughs to no-mow,
low-input grasses and (ii) determine the best turfgrass species that provides a playable
and aesthetically pleasing turfgrass stand for this type of conversion.
Five grass species and five conversion methods were evaluated at two locations
in Minnesota (Maple Grove, MN and St. Paul, MN). Data collected included visual stand
quality, tendency for lodging, inflorescence counts, biomass production, Kentucky
bluegrass regrowth, and broadleaf weed invasion. At Maple Grove, the fumigation
treatment provided the highest visual stand quality ratings and the sod removal treatment
at St. Paul provided the highest visual stand quality. Only sheep fescue (Festuca ovina
L.) was able to provide acceptable visual stand quality by Year 2 and only at St. Paul.
Chewing’s fesuce (Festuca rubra L. ssp. commutata Gaudin) and strong creeping red
fescue (Festuca rubra L. ssp. rubra) were best at resisting broadleaf weed invasion at
both locations. Hard fescue (Festuca brevipila Tracey) was best at resisting lodging along with strong creeping red fescue in Year 2 at both locations. Due to its perennial nature and rhizomatous growth habit, it may be difficult to
obtain complete control of Kentucky bluegrass when converting to a no-mow, low-input
area. Selective removal of Kentucky bluegrass regrowth may be needed when converting
to low-maintenance grasses. Previous studies have shown that fine fescues (Festuca
spp.) have a high tolerance to the herbicide sethoxydim (2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one) and it may provide the answer when
needing to selectively remove Kentucky bluegrass from fine fescue. The objectives of
this second study were (i) to compare the tolerance of cool-season turfgrass species and
cultivars to sethoxydim and (ii) determine species tolerance at different application rates.
Four herbicide rates (0.0, 1.315, 2.630, and 5.26 L·ha-1) were applied to fifteen coolseason
grasses (5 Kentucky bluegrass cultivars, 3 tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia
cespitosa [L.] Beauv.) cultivars and selections, ‘Gator’ perennial ryegrass (Lolium
perenne L.), ‘Plantation’ tall fescue, (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), a native prairie
junegrass breeding line (Koeleria macrantha [Ledeb.] Schult.), and 4 species of fine
fescues. All fine fescue species tested in the study were unharmed by all rates of
sethoxydim. Surprisingly, tufted hairgrass showed some tolerance to sethoxydim in 2008
and performed better in 2009. Tall fescue was not tolerant in 2008, but showed some
sethoxydim tolerance in 2009. All other species saw individual plant quality decline
below acceptable levels by 5 WAT.
Keywords
Description
University of Minnesota M.S. thesis. January 2013. Major: Applied plant sciences. 1 computer file (PDF); vi, 71 pages.
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Cavanaugh, Matthew J. (2013). Methods and species for conversion of Kentucky bluegrass rough to no-mow, low-input turfgrass areas. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/146386.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.