The Decision to Know
2015-05
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
The Decision to Know
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
2015-05
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
Without careful consideration of the situatedness of the subject and object of knowledge acquisition, epistemic harms may result from the unrelenting, uncritical pursuit of knowledge. Through an examination of three cases of information seeking of the biomedical/scientific type including pregnancy, the role of nurses in caring for patients and transmitting knowledge, and "knowing what it's like" to be disabled, it is argued that a variety of epistemic harms may result. The epistemic harms considered include testimonial and hermeneutic injustice, and epistemic imperialism and unsustainability.
Keywords
Description
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. May 2015. Major: Philosophy. Advisor: Naomi Scheman. 1 computer file (PDF); iii, 142 pages.
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Kringle, Kirsten. (2015). The Decision to Know. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/175218.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.