The Decision to Know

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

The Decision to Know

Alternative title

Published Date

2015-05

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Without careful consideration of the situatedness of the subject and object of knowledge acquisition, epistemic harms may result from the unrelenting, uncritical pursuit of knowledge. Through an examination of three cases of information seeking of the biomedical/scientific type including pregnancy, the role of nurses in caring for patients and transmitting knowledge, and "knowing what it's like" to be disabled, it is argued that a variety of epistemic harms may result. The epistemic harms considered include testimonial and hermeneutic injustice, and epistemic imperialism and unsustainability.

Keywords

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. May 2015. Major: Philosophy. Advisor: Naomi Scheman. 1 computer file (PDF); iii, 142 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Kringle, Kirsten. (2015). The Decision to Know. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/175218.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.