Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Municipal Wastewater Sludge and High Strength Waste: An Evaluation of Waste Degradation Potentials

2015-12
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Municipal Wastewater Sludge and High Strength Waste: An Evaluation of Waste Degradation Potentials

Published Date

2015-12

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Research has demonstrated the abundant treatment and economic opportunities presented by co-digestion of high strength wastewater, but these wastes also have the potential to cause digester failure. Indeed, based on what is known about the disruption of digesters, if a municipality is considering co-digestion, it needs to know the characteristics of high strength wastewaters that have a predictable potential for disruption. The Metropolitan Council-Environmental Services (MCES) is one such municipality interested in pursuing co-digestion. MCES is interested in expanding current digester use to include co-digestion of high strength waste streams to reduce their energy and sludge disposal costs. The objective of this research was to develop a protocol for MCES to be used in evaluating the feasibility of co-digesting municipal wastewater sludge with other high strength wastes. The protocol involves anaerobic biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays inoculated by source anaerobic digesters and amended with PBS, sludge (TPS/TWAS mixture), waste, or waste combined with sludge. Co-digestion experiments examined well-characterized synthetic wastes (starch, gelatin, tween 80, and cysteine) and wastes of interest to MCES with unknown impacts (dimethylformamide, dairy processing waste, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, thickened primary sludge, thickened waste activated sludge, and scum collected from the primary clarifier at an MCES wastewater treatment facility). These wastes were characterized as degradable, non-degradable, toxic or degradable after an adaptation period. Gelatin, tween 80, dairy processing waste, ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol were degradable, while dimethylformamide was non-degradable. Cysteine, a sulfur-rich waste, was found to be toxic at concentrations greater than 200 mg/L. Scum, ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol required an adaptation period before being degraded. Additionally, the microbial analysis via qPCR indicated that the abundance of Bacteria and methanogens in the co-digestion experiments were not statistically different from the sludge-only experiments, even when different types of wastes were tested (i.e., degradable, non-degradable, toxic, etc.). The developed method and subsequent guidelines will be useful for MCES and other wastewater treatment facilities when making informed decisions about whether or not to accept potential high strength wastes for co-digestion with sludge.

Description

University of Minnesota M.S. thesis. December 2015. Major: Civil Engineering. Advisors: Paige Novak, Timothy LaPara. 1 computer file (PDF); v, 85 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Prok, Amy. (2015). Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Municipal Wastewater Sludge and High Strength Waste: An Evaluation of Waste Degradation Potentials. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/182130.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.