Strategic Ambiguity in the Production and Reception of War Dramas

Abstract

This project uses the rhetorical concept of strategic ambiguity to analyze how U.S. war films from 2006 through 2011 framed the politics of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. I argue that, rather than presenting partisan propaganda or apolitical drama, these films purposefully ambiguated their political positions in order to please both supporters and opponents of the wars. I begin by examining how industrial constraints on depicting the politics the wars led to ambiguity as a representational tactic. Using the 2007 drama <italic>Grace Is Gone</italic> as a case study, I then conduct a qualitative and quantitative audience survey suggesting how viewers' can interpret the film's political positions. I conclude by arguing that, rather than criticizing Hollywood for a left- or rightwing bias in matters of war, we must instead understand how discourses of apoliticality serve the industry's military-industrial interests.