Warring opinions: an investigation into the sublime aesthetic narratives of contemporary warfare.

Loading...

View/Download File

Licht_umn_0130E_11338.pdf (812.9 KB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/97289

Statistics

View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Warring opinions: an investigation into the sublime aesthetic narratives of contemporary warfare.

Authors

Licht, Melissa Vera

Published Date

2010-08

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

This project uses aesthetic concepts of the sublime as critical categories for exploring opinions and subjective responses to war as they are presented in selected soldiers' memoirs, literary theory, films, and public affairs-from World War I to the (ongoing) Gulf War. Representations of sublime force as well as sublime sacrifice and idealism permeate even "objective" journalistic accounts of warfare and inform the perspectives through which we engage with war in thought and feeling. The project argues that "opinion" is not merely a rationally measurable statistical phenomenon but an aesthetic problematic through which we experience ourselves in relation to the world. Soldiers' memoirs and public discourses narrate the trauma of war and express opinions that swing between and simultaneously uphold radically different positions: war as a sublime communal endeavor versus war as the destruction of social meaning. These opposing opinions reflect different aesthetic and narrative strategies: different ways of representing one's position in the world and of managing overpowering forces and emotions. Opinion itself is built and supported through our emotional narratives of sublime antagonism and/or sublime interest in the social world. The critical thought of Hannah Arendt, J. Glenn Gray, Paul de Man, Walter Benjamin, Sigmund Freud, and Immanuel Kant are central to the analysis of sources throughout the project.

Keywords

Aesthetics

Narrative

Public Opinion

Sublime

Veterans

War Memoir

Comparative Literature

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. Major: Comparative Literature. Advisor: Thomas Pepper. 1 computer file (PDF); iii, 290 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Dissertations

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Licht, Melissa Vera. (2010). Warring opinions: an investigation into the sublime aesthetic narratives of contemporary warfare.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/97289.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.