Human Versus Computer Algorithmic Measurements of Caloric Response: Implications for Test Analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Human Versus Computer Algorithmic Measurements of Caloric Response: Implications for Test Analysis

Published Date

2018-12

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify variation introduced to bithermal caloric test (BCT) analysis by data cleaning and determine how variation differs between examiners. Methods: Analysis of 435 consecutive BCTs performed by 6 examiners using identical protocols on adults with dizziness. Outcomes of total eye speed (TES) and unilateral weakness (UW%) were compared between examiner-modified tracings and automated algorithms. Results: Algorithms erroneously selected artifact in 9.7% of tests. Examiner cleaning resulted in a mean change in TES of (-)4deg/sec (95%CI 3-4, p<0.001) but no change in UW%. Limits of agreement (Bland-Altman analyses) for TES were (-)20 to (+)8deg/sec and for UW (-)10 to 10% and varied between examiners. Algorithms had 15% false negative and 2% false positive rates. Conclusions: Data cleaning may reduce the rate of false negative results. Differences in cleaning methods may produce test-retest and inter-individual variation and alter lab-derived normative values. Consensus is needed regarding optimal data cleaning methods.

Description

University of Minnesota M.S. thesis. December 2018. Major: Clinical Research. Advisor: Bevan Yueh. 1 computer file (PDF); iv, 30 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Adams, Meredith. (2018). Human Versus Computer Algorithmic Measurements of Caloric Response: Implications for Test Analysis. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/218671.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.