How the Presidential Nomination Process is Failing
Authors
Published Date
Publisher
Type
Abstract
Keywords
Description
The rules of the presidential nomination process can seem endlessly complex with primaries versus caucuses, early primaries, delegate counts, and convention rules. But over the years the parties have developed informal rules as well, with norms and expectations about how the presidential nomination process will unfold. Who wins and who loses under the real rules? Join us for a conversation with Professor Julia Azari of Marquette University to discuss how the informal rules changed in 2016, and what it means for 2020? University of Minnesota Professor Kathryn Pearson will moderate.
Prof. Julia Azari is Associate Professor and Assistant Chair in the Department of Political Science at Marquette University. She teaches on the American presidency, political parties, and politics, and is a contributor to fivethirtyeight.com. Prof. Azari has PH.D., M.A. and M.Phil degrees in political science from Yale University, and a B.A. in political science for the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Related to
item.page.replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding Information
item.page.isbn
DOI identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested Citation
Jacobs, Lawrence R.. (2020). How the Presidential Nomination Process is Failing. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/225848.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.