Writing Style Differences in Newspaper, Radio, and Television News

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Writing Style Differences in Newspaper, Radio, and Television News

Published Date

1991

Publisher

University of Minnesota

Type

Book

Abstract

Students who begin the study of broadcast news have complained of the difficulty of writing in an unaccustomed style, a difficulty compounded when the student is concurrently taking a broadcast news course and a news editorial skills course. The confusion which results from writing in a separate style for each course in order to produce news copy presents the novice journalist with the type of trouble found in learning a new language dialect. Many students leave with an imperfect understanding of any news writing style. No magical way exists to learn a foreign language without practice, and none exists for developing facility in more than one writing style without experience. Nevertheless, it may be possible to ease the burden of writing in more than one style by systematically examining the styles to determine what sets them apart. That different news writing styles have evolved in newspapers, radio, and television is due to the unique nature of each medium and to the manner in which each medium is consumed by its audience. This study set out to consider the reasons for these differences and to examine in a systematic manner what the differences actually are. As many textbooks as could be found that dealt with newspaper, radio, and television news writing were examined to glean writing style recommendations. Additionally, the author called on his own years of experience in writing for newspapers and television newscast. Finally, seven working journalists in the three media under consideration were interviewed at length about various points of current practice, and a draft of the study's conclusions was shown to them for their comments. Where replies to questions seemed significant, these were noted in the written report. The elements of style examined were leads, story structure, sentence structure, word choice, and the conventions of naming, quotation, and attribution. In the final report, shared approaches to each element are identified first, followed by instances where some differences exist among the three media, with examples of those differences. Where possible, explanations are offered for why approaches were shared or different. The report is also innovative in that it presents side-by-side comparisons across the three media. The final report has already been distributed to one group of broadcast journalism students as a guide to their own development of writing style, accompanied by the admonition that merely reading about writing serves no purpose except perhaps to provide students with the awareness that radio news and television news writing styles have logical foundation and are, to say the least, as difficult to learn and as worthy of learning as standard American newspaper style.

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

The Grants for the Study of Writing in the Disciplines (WID Grants) program at the Center for Writing provides financial and consultative support for UMN faculty and instructors who want to learn more about how writing is conceptualized, taught, and learned (or unlearned) in the disciplines.

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Fang, Irving. (1991). Writing Style Differences in Newspaper, Radio, and Television News. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/254317.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.