An initial study to develop instruments and validate the Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators (ECPE)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

An initial study to develop instruments and validate the Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators (ECPE)

Published Date

2012-06

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Contemporary program evaluation emerged in the 1960s with the unprecedented Great Society programs. Over the past half of a century, program evaluation has clearly developed, yet it has not developed into a full-fledged profession. Unlike many established professions, program evaluation does not have certification or licensure for evaluators and cannot exclude unqualified persons from the profession. Evaluator competencies are one of the underpinning foundations of professional designation. Evaluator competencies demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required in program evaluators. The Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators, developed by King et al. (2001) and revised by Stevahn et al. (2005), were one of the first efforts at specifying evaluator competencies. The purpose of this study was to develop instruments (a web-based survey and interview protocol) to initially validate the Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators using Messick's (1989, 1995a, 1995b) concept of unitary validity as a framework. The validated evaluator competencies can be used to enhance the professionalization of the field of evaluation.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. June 2012. Major: Educational Policy and Administration. Advisor: Jean A. King. 1 computer file (PDF); ix, 149 pages, appendices A-B.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Wilcox, Yuanjing. (2012). An initial study to develop instruments and validate the Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators (ECPE). Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/132042.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.