Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.

Browsing by Subject "senior oral health comparison study"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Oral Health Quality of Life for Seniors in Residential Facilities who Have Direct Access to Care as Compared to Those Without Access
    (2018-05) Golden, Jennafer
    Introduction: Many residents of senior residential facilities face obstacles to good oral health as most are medically compromised and cannot provide adequate self-care. Consequently, the oral health status of this population is generally poor and has a negative impact on quality of life. The purpose of this study was to test whether there is a perceived difference in oral health and comfort when residents in long-term care facilities receive direct access to a dental cleaning compared to facilities who brush and floss only. Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare the Oral Health Impact Profile-5(OHIP-5) between treatment and control groups in senior long term care facilities. Methods: The study design was quasi-experimental. The study took place in two senior residential facilities in Sheridan, Wyoming. Fifteen residents from each facility comprised the study sample (n=30). The treatment group received a dental cleaning and oral hygiene education and the control group received brushing, flossing, and oral hygiene education. There were two interventions, two months apart. A pre/test was conducted using the 5 question Oral Health Impact Profile, shortened version. Post test was conducted one month after the last intervention. Results: Fifteen residents from the treatment facility and the control facility comprised the study sample (n=30). The treatment group was comprised of 13% male subjects and 87% female subjects with an average age of 85. The control group had 40% male subjects and 60% female subjects with and average age of 76. The percent of subjects who do not receive regular dental care at a private dentist was 53% of the treatment group and 40% of the control group. Active caries and chronic periodontitis were also present in both groups; caries were detected in 67% of the subjects in the control group and 87% in the treatment group. Results revealed a significant difference in pre/post OHIP-5 scores in the treatment group (p=0.0222). The control group had improved scores but it was not significant (p=0.5331). The significant univariate association was between caries and OHIP-5 scores (p=0.0082). Conclusion: This study demonstrated a significant difference in the perception of oral health quality of life when seniors received a dental cleaning where they reside. Findings support existing knowledge and evidence that oral health services improve the functional status and quality of life of senior adults living in long-term care facilities.