Browsing by Subject "political ecology"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ecologies, Economies, and Resilience: State Restoration Imaginaries & Vietnamese/American Fishing Futures in Southeast Louisiana
    (2019-08) Kang, Simi
    This project lies at the intersection of Asian American studies, critical refugee studies, environmental injustice and racism, and engages community-level interventions into restoration policy and practice in Southeast Louisiana. Over the last 15 years, coastal land loss and vulnerability to disaster has been at the center of how government officials, residents, and everyone in between talk about coastal Louisiana’s future. Significantly, where residents are often told these environmental ills are ‘natural’ and thus difficult to apprehend, their origins are quite clear. Land subsidence (or sinking), which is typical of the marshland that forms Louisiana’s coast, is spurred on by federally supported oil extraction, natural gas exploration, and shipping canals, which all cut up and hasten the dissolution of the already subsiding and porous coast. Damming, leveeing, and other infrastructure management along the Mississippi River make residents even more vulnerable to climate-change-induced flooding and storms. All of these decision-maker-produced ills make the daily lives of folks who rely on the health of the Gulf and the coast not just difficult, but increasingly impossible. This is particularly the case for Vietnamese/Americans, who decision-makers continue to racialize as refugees well equipped at surviving upheaval. As a result of this refugee racialization, Vietnamese/Americans are at once rendered more ‘resilient’ to the above disasters and erased from mitigation and support efforts as resilient refugees, or exemplary survivors of disaster who, in addition to their particular aptitude for assimilating U.S. culture and values into their families and communities, are adept at incorporating disaster policy and coastal regulatory practices into their daily lives. In spite of this, as perpetual refugees, they may never be fully “American.”
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Political (Wild)Life: What More-Than-Human Relations Can Tell Us About the Politics of Space
    (2018-12) McCrea, Gwendolin
    This research is concerned with the effects of more-than-human relations on environmental governance. These questions can help us understand how the everyday practices of natural resource management are shaped by relations with the more-than-human world, while also provoking thought about the concepts that we use to understand those relations. Drawing on a theoretical engagement with relational ontologies and the nonhuman turn in the social sciences, the investigation is centered on interactions among humans and wildlife in a public park with a natural resource protection and environmental education mission. The central research questions are: •How do natural resource managers and other practitioners understand human-wildlife relations, and how do those understandings inform objectives, practices, and metrics for success? •In what ways do wildlife exceed those understandings and therefore force thought and natural resource management practices in unexpected directions? •How have these more-than-human processes shaped the park as a natural resource park, wildlife sanctuary, and urban wetland? And how, in turn, do those formations affect relations among wildlife and humans? The dissertation focuses on three sets of relations, presented as provocations that force a rethinking of the concepts of territory, biopolitics, and governance. Chapter One proposes a materialist theory of territory that permits an analysis of territories as emergent properties of more-than-human assemblages. As such, territorial formations can be established, maintained, and transformed not only through territorial behaviors and practices, but also through assemblage relations. Chapter Two looks closely at the park’s bird population management strategies and the responses of birds to those strategies; it offers an interpretation of those interactions as a biopolitics without biopolitical subjectivity. The final chapter concerns the capacities of beavers to alter landscapes and thereby prompt transformations in the governance of the park as an urban wetland. It suggests that this relation between park managers and beavers as creators of wetland ecosystems might be understood as a form of more-than-human cosmoecological governance. The dissertation concludes with some thoughts about the composing of shared worlds and the park as an experiment in multispecies living.