Browsing by Subject "inventory"
Now showing 1 - 20 of 27
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item 1988 Minnesota Inventory of Computer Mapping Systems: Software, Applications, Graphic Data Files & Expertise.(St. Paul: Regional Mapping Consortium, c/o Metropolitan Council Data Center., 1988) Craig, William J.Item Business Analysis of the Midtown Lake Street Commercial Corridor in South Minneapolis.(2002) Fant, Merrie AnnItem Clinical Abbreviation Sense Inventory(2012-10-31) Moon, Sungrim; Pakhomov, Serguei; Melton, GenevieveA sense inventory is a collection of abbreviations and acronyms (short forms) with their possible senses (long forms), along with other corresponding information about these terms. For our comprehensive sense inventory for clinical abbreviations and acronyms, a total of 440 most frequently used abbreviations and acronyms were selected from 352,267 dictated clinical notes. 949 senses of each abbreviation and acronym were manually annotated from 500 random instances within clinical notes and lexically aligned with 17,359 long forms of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), 5,233 long forms of Another Database of Abbreviations in Medline (ADAM), and 4,879 long forms in Stedman’s Medical Abbreviations, Acronyms & Symbols (4th edition).Item Clinical Symbol Sense Inventory(2012-10-31) Moon, Sungrim; Pakhomov, Serguei; Melton, GenevieveAlthough clinical texts contain many symbols, relatively little attention has been given to symbol resolution by medical natural language processing (NLP) researchers. Interpreting the meaning of symbols may be viewed as a special case of Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD). One thousand instances of four common non-alphanumeric symbols (‘+’, ‘–’, ‘/’, and ‘#’) were randomly extracted from a clinical document repository and annotated by experts. De-identified data are available for researchers.Item Creating a Housing Database for the East Side Neighborhood of St. Paul, Minnesota.(1997) Kellner, StephanieItem Duluth Open Space Initiative Organizational Goals and Action Steps(2006) Schommer, JeffItem Environmental Research at the University of Minnesota: An Inventory of Research Related to Public Policy, 1990-1992.(Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota, 1992) Anding, Thomas L.; Carter, Sheryl A.; Lange, Nancy M.; Wolfe, Margaret R.Item Growing Energy Crops on Minnesota's Wetlands: The Land Use Perspective.(Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota, 1984) Anderson, Jeffrey P.; Craig, William J.Item Highway 29 North Shore Asset Inventory(2005) Forbord, Mary Jo; Maringer, Andrea; Linscheid, Neil; Winchester, Benjamin SItem Information Circular 46. Aggregate Resources Inventory of the Seven-County Metropolitan Area, Minnesota(Minnesota Geological Survey, 2000) Southwick, D.L.; Jouseau, M.; Meyer, G.N.; Mossler, J.H.; Wahl, T.E.Construction aggregates are sand, gravel, and crushed rock-bulk granular materials that are used in building and landscaping projects of all sizes and kinds. Most of the highest quality aggregate is used in the manufacture of concrete and top-grade asphalt paving. Aggregates of lower quality are used as fill, base-course for roads, and for a myriad of other purposes. Aggregate quality is determined by the mechanical and chemical properties of the constituent rock particles. In very general terms, the best aggregates for high-end uses contain particles that are strong (resist abrasion and fracturing), chemically inert (do not decompose, swell, or shrink on exposure to air, moisture, or road chemicals; do not react adversely with cement materials), and are of optimum size and shape for the specific engineering requirements. High-strength concrete for heavy-duty use such as highways and airport runways requires aggregate composed of particles that are strong and inert, and also have broken faces; i.e. they are not round and smooth. This broken shape enables the particles to lock up mechanically with one another rather than roll under stress, and improves the durability of the paving. Construction aggregate producers and their largest customers in the construction sector have recognized for many years that the aggregate resources available for mining within the seven- county metropolitan area are rapidly diminishing. The ultimate reason for this is urbanization, which on the one hand increases the demand for construction aggregates, and on the other, tends to remove aggregate-bearing lands from production through land development and zoning decisions that preclude mining. When sources of aggregate are eliminated locally, and become more remote from places of need, the costs of construction rise significantly. This is mainly because of the increased cost associated with aggregate transportation. Cost increases are felt most acutely in large projects such as freeway or airport runway construction that require huge volumes of high-quality aggregate for concrete. Local decision-makers have become increasingly aware of aggregate-resource issues over the past few decades. Most counties and townships are substantial purchasers of aggregate materials for road building and other purposes, and are therefore sensitive to aggregate costs. Many are also involved in the controversies between neighbors and aggregate producers over the noise, dust, truck traffic, and other environmental impacts (real or perceived) associated with aggregate- mining operations. In Minnesota, including the seven-county metropolitan area, the powers to regulate aggregate mining and associated industrial operations reside largely at the county, city, and township level. Issues of land-use planning and regulation that apply to the construction aggregates industry need to be resolved. Government entities, the aggregate industry, and citizens of the seven-county metropolitan area all require dependable information on the physical distribution of aggregate resources and the probable economic lifespan of the local resource base. This report and the companion geological maps on which it is based (Meyer and MossIer, 1999) were prepared to meet that need.Item Inventory of Public Policy Research Related to Greater Minnesota: Results of a Survey of University of Minnesota Faculty.(Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota, 1995) Anding, Thomas L.; Lukermann, Barbara L.; Wolfe, Margaret R.Item Major Forest Types - Minnesota 1977 Inventory.(1977) Minnesota State Planning AgencyItem Minnesota’s Network of Parks & Trails: An Inventory of Recreation Experience Opportunities in Minnesota: Metro Region Profile(Center for Changing Landscapes, 2010) Davenport, Mae; Schneider, Ingrid E.; Date, Andrea; Filter, LisaItem Minnesota’s Network of Parks & Trails: An Inventory of Recreation Experience Opportunities in Minnesota: Northwest Region Profile(Center for Changing Landscapes, 2010) Davenport, Mae; Schneider, Ingrid; Date, Andrea; Filter, LisaItem Minnesota’s Network of Parks & Trails: An Inventory of Recreation Experience Opportunities in Minnesota: South Region Profile(Center for Changing Landscapes, 2010) Davenport, MaeItem New York Mills Sculpture Garden(2006) Sullivan, ErinItem North End Rental Census.(2000) Pazandak, Sarah