Browsing by Subject "facilitation"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Climate and competition affect growth and survival of transplanted sugar maple seedlings along a 1700‐km gradient
    (Wiley, 2017) Putnam, Rachel C
    Plant species distributions, broadly shaped by climate, may also be constrained by other species. The degree to which biotic factors affect range limits is unclear, however, and few experimental studies have investigated both biotic and abiotic factors across and beyond a species’ range. We examined seedling survival and net growth for three years in contrasting canopy type (closed canopy vs. gap) and neighbor density (clipped vs. unclipped) environments for northern, central, and southern populations of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) representing a climate- of- origin gradient, experimentally planted from Arkansas, USA to Ontario, Canada at ten forested sites along a 1700- km transect spanning beyond the species’ range. We hypoth-esized that each population’s highest survival and growth would occur in its region of origin, with poorer performance in cooler or warmer areas. Refuting this hypothesis, seedlings of all three populations had greater growth and survival in sites increasingly warmer than their point of origin, although they did show poorer growth and survival at increasingly colder sites. We also hypothesized that maple survival and net growth near and beyond range margins are con-strained primarily by cold temperature limitation in the north, where we expected neighbors to facilitate survival, and by competition in the south, where we expected to enhance survival and growth by reducing neighbor density. Results partially supported the hypothesis concerning biotic interactions: in canopy gaps, understory neighbors enhanced maple growth at the cool-est sites but did not suppress growth as expected at the warmest sites. As the northern popula-tion grew and survived reasonably well beyond the northern range limit, and as all populations performed best at warmer sites, including beyond the southern range limit, there was tepid, if any, support for the hypothesis that climate regulated the northern limit and absolutely no support for the hypothesis that competition regulated the southern limit. Together, these three- year findings with juvenile trees suggest that sugar maple range limits may instead be con-strained by factors besides climate and competition, by those factors at another life stage, and/or by climate events such as heat waves, droughts, and cold snaps that occur at longer return intervals.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Forests and Biodiversity cleaned biomass survey data 2013-2018
    (2021-02-12) Kothari, Shan; Montgomery, Rebecca A; Cavender-Bares, Jeannine; kotha020@umn.edu; Kothari, Shan; University of Minnesota Cavender-Bares Lab; University of Minnesota Montgomery Lab; Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve
    This dataset includes annual growth survey measurements from the Forests and Biodiversity 1 (e271) experiment at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve in East Bethel, MN. The dataset also includes a script that allows users to reproduce the figures and statistics reported in the cited paper. This version of the dataset is specifically meant to support the inferences in that paper, rather than serving as the version of record. Please consult the Cedar Creek Data Catalog (https://www.cedarcreek.umn.edu/research/data) to find the authoritative version to be used for general purposes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Untangling positive and negative biotic interactions: Views from above and below ground in a forest ecosystem
    (Ecological Society of America, 2010) Montgomery, Rebecca A; Reich, Peter B; Palik, Brian J
    In ecological communities, the outcome of plant–plant interactions represents the net effect of positive and negative interactions occurring above and below ground. Untangling these complex relationships can provide a better understanding of mechanisms that underlie plant–plant interactions and enhance our ability to predict population, community, and ecosystem effects of biotic interactions. In forested ecosystems, tree seedlings interact with established vegetation, but the mechanisms and outcomes of these interactions are not well understood. To explore such mechanisms, we manipulated above- and belowground interactions among tree seedlings, shrubs, and trees and monitored seedling survival and growth of six species (Pinus banksiana, Betula papyrifera, P. resinosa, Quercus rubra, P. strobus, and Acer rubrum) in mature pine-dominated forest in northern Minnesota, USA. The forest had a moderately open canopy and sandy soils. Understory manipulations were implemented in the forest interior and in large gaps and included removal of shrubs (no interactions), tieback of shrubs (belowground), removal of shrubs with addition of shade (aboveground), and unmanipulated shrubs (both below- and aboveground). We found that shrubs either suppressed or facilitated seedling survival and growth depending on the seedling species, source of interaction (e.g., above- or belowground), and ecological context (e.g., gap or forest interior). In general, shrubs strongly influenced survival and growth in gaps, with more modest effects in the forest interior. In gaps, the presence of shrub roots markedly decreased seedling growth and survival, supporting the idea that belowground competition may be more important in dry, nutrient-poor sites. Shrub shade effects were neutral for three species and facilitative for the other three. Facilitation was more likely for shade-tolerant species. In the forest interior, shrub shade negatively affected seedling survival for the most shade-intolerant species. For several species the net effect of shrubs masked the existence of both positive and negative interactions above and below ground. Our results highlight the complexity of plant–plant interactions, demonstrate that outcomes of these interactions vary with the nature of resource limitation and the ecophysiology of the species involved, and suggest that ecological theory that rests on particular notions of plant–plant interactions (e.g., competition) should consider simultaneous positive and negative interactions occurring above and below ground.