Browsing by Subject "dairy cattle"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Crossbred Genotype Admixture
    (2022-04-27) Heins, Bradley; Huson, Heather; Dechow, Chad; Azwan Jaafar, Mohd; hein0106@umn.edu; Heins, Bradley; University of Minnesota West Central Research and Outreach Center Dairy Herd
    Our study evaluated two 3-breed rotational crossbred dairy cattle populations. ProCROSS is a product of crossbreeding Viking Red, Holstein, and Montbeliarde whereas Grazecross consists of Viking Red, Normande, and Jersey. The rotational crossbreeding system capitalizes on heterosis with each generation and the specific breeds used target trait improvement and development for certain environments.The effect of ancestry and use of reference populations in determining ancestry in ProCROSS and Grazecross were analyzed using genomic and pedigree-based estimations.Our study provides evidence of the importance of identifying the most appropriate reference animals and the effect of ancestry composition on ProCROSS and Grazecross dairy cattle performance. This work is supported by Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative [grant no. 2016-51300-25862/project accession no. 1010366] from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating the Relationship between Hoof Trimming and Dairy Cattle Well-Being
    (2018-03) Stoddard, Grant
    The aim of this thesis was to provide knowledge to the dairy industry about HT and to provide science based recommendations on if LIT or BIG model is more effective at preventing lameness and lesions. Based on the results from this thesis it was shown that the HT process is associated with behavior changes and causes an acute stress response and decreases milk yield. Based on the results of these objectives the acute stress response is due to restraint, not the actual removal of horn during the HT process. The decrease in milk yield that was observed after HT needs further research to determine what effect disruption of the cow’s day with no access to feed has on milk yield. In addition, we compared a HT technique that is currently used in the industry to an adaptation that increased the modeling on the weight bearing claw. Based on a subset analysis, this adaptation was protective for hoof horn lesions and lameness for cows trimmed at the end of their first lactation. However, there was no difference between the two HT techniques for long term milk yield and culling risk. The final conclusion was BIG model is more effective at preventing hoof horn lesions than the LIT model, and there was no evidence that BIG model (vs LIT) was detrimental to the welfare of the cow based on milk yield and culling risk.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Feeding the dairy herd (reviewed 1996)
    (University of Minnesota Extension Service, 1996) Linn, James; Hutjens, Michael; Shaver, Randy; Otterby, Donald; Howard, W. Terry; Kilmer, Lee H.