Browsing by Subject "best management practices"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Increasing the Environmental Services of Working Agricultural Lands Through Best Management Practices(2015-09) O'Neill, AnnConservation managers working to reduce agricultural nonpoint source (NPS) pollution through best management practice (BMP) implementation must work in light of competing objectives and multiple constraints. These include the limitations of current decision frameworks, budgets, and socially acceptable practices. All three studies in this dissertation sought to investigate one primary, over-arching question: What strategies should conservation decision makers consider to increase environmental services through BMP implementation on working agricultural lands? The first study addresses this question from a social science perspective, by using focus group methodology to describe and analyze the decision making process of conservation managers working to implement BMPs on agricultural lands in Minnesota. The study develops a descriptive decision framework of local conservation managers, which may be useful to enable evidence-based conservation efforts to overcome the knowledge-implementation gap. A second study addresses this question from physical science and economics perspectives, by comparing rankings of BMP physical effectiveness (% of total phosphorus removed) to BMP cost-effectiveness ($/lb. of total phosphorus removed). Empirical BMP effectiveness studies from five Midwestern states and cost data from Minnesota BMP installations were used. Study results demonstrate the importance of including cost data, along with pollution reduction data, in agricultural BMP decision processes. This research summarizes the wide range of cost-effectiveness values for BMP implementation, both within and between agricultural BMPs, and offers suggestions to use limited conservation resources more efficiently. The third study addresses this question from a techno-economic and policy perspective, by developing a model to estimate the economic feasibility and environmental implications of various scenarios of microwave assisted pyrolysis (MAP) units to process cellulosic biofuels from perennial feedstock BMPs in southern Minnesota. The study finds that the expected economies of scale gained by the mobility of small-scale pyrolysis units are not sufficient to overcome the increased labor costs, but that stationary small-scale distributed pyrolysis units show some economic promise, particularly if environmental benefits are considered. This research is of primary interest to state and perhaps federal-level policy makers working to design efficient and effective programs to implement BMPs to improve water quality and increase the provision of environmental services on working agricultural lands.Item State approaches for monitoring the application of best management practices and forest management guidelines : a regional summary.(University of Minnesota, 2004-06) Phillips, Michael J.; Blinn, Charles R.Forestry has developed and published best management practices (BMPs) and forest management guidelines in 49 states. Although the major focus continues to be water quality protection, guidelines related to protecting wildlife habitat, visual quality, and cultural resources are becoming more common. These guidelines are applied across a wide range of forest landowner categories and forest management activities. A survey of state forestry agencies found that compliance monitoring for guideline application is conducted in 38 states. All southern states have monitoring programs. States tend to monitor all public and private forest landowner categories in their states. Monitoring sites are most frequently selected from a subsample of sites from all landowner categories. In many states, all sites have an equal probability of being selected for monitoring. In other states, a variety of criteria are used to identify potential candidate monitoring sites. Southern states concentrate on monitoring the application of water quality BMPs while northern and western states evaluate sites against a broader array of guidelines (e.g., cultural resources, visual quality, wildlife habitat) in addition to the water quality BMPs. Southern states monitor a wide range of forest management activities while northern and western states focus on monitoring timber harvesting and associated road construction and maintenance.Item Timber harvester perceptions of benefits and costs of applying water quality best management practices in Minnesota.(University of Minnesota, 1997-03) Alden, Anne-Marie; Blinn, Charles R.; Ellefson, Paul V.; Nordin, P. G.