Browsing by Subject "behavioral economics"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Behavioral Economics Strategies and Vegetable Consumption Among Low-Income Children(2015-08) Leak, TasharaChildren from a low socioeconomic background are at increased risk for becoming obese, which underscores the importance of encouraging healthful behaviors such as vegetable consumption. Several factors influence child vegetable intake, including whether children like vegetables and if vegetables are available for consumption. Researchers have attempted to improve child vegetable intake in the school setting through the use of behavioral economics-informed changes in the cafeteria, where the social and physical environment is manipulated in a way to "nudge" children to make healthier choices. Interventions grounded in behavioral economics have been shown to improve vegetable intake in the school setting but have not been thoroughly explored in the home food environment. The latter is an ideal setting in which to improve vegetable consumption because children consume the majority of their daily calories at home. This dissertation investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of behavioral economics strategies to improve vegetable intake at dinner meals among children aged 9-12 residing in households receiving food assistance. Included in this dissertation were three studies which determined the feasibility of implementing behavioral economics strategies (Phase 1), measured the effectiveness of behavioral economics strategies to increase child vegetable intake (Phase 2), and explored adolescent involvement in home food preparation. Exploring the Feasibility of Implementing Behavioral Economics Strategies to Increase Vegetable Intake, Liking, and Variety Among Children Aged 9 to 12 Residing in Food Assistance Households (Phase 1). Phase 1 was a formative study that aimed to identify facilitators and barriers caregivers may experience when implementing strategies during dinner preparation and mealtime. One-time, in-home observations of dinner preparation and mealtime were conducted with caregiver/child dyads (n = 20). Survey data to assess vegetable availability, parent and child vegetable liking, and household food security were collected. Facilitators included liking of most vegetables by caregivers and children, and home vegetable availability (most families had 7-21 different types of vegetables available in the home). Barriers included perceived time constraints, lack of appropriate vegetable types or utensils/dishware, and concerns about child involvement in food preparation. Based on Phase 1 data, nine behavioral economics strategies were selected for further evaluation in a randomized controlled trial (Phase 2). Testing the Effectiveness of In-Home Behavioral Economics Strategies to Increase Vegetable Intake and Liking Among Children Residing in Households that Receive Food Assistance (Phase 2). The objectives for Phase 2 were to 1) to determine the 6 of 9 most effective and feasible behavioral economics strategies, and 2) to evaluate if 9 behavioral economics strategies increase vegetable intake, liking, and availability during a randomized controlled trial. Over the course of six weeks, caregivers in the intervention group (n = 39) incorporated one new strategy/week. Caregivers in the control group (n = 10) were not assigned strategies. For Objective 1, parent-reported food records (3 days/week) were used to assess child vegetable consumption at dinner meals on the days that strategies were implemented. Caregivers in the intervention group rated the level of difficulty for assigned strategies (1 - not difficult to 10 - very difficult) during weekly phone calls. They also reported facilitators and barriers to implementing the strategies. No differences were observed between intervention and control group for mean child dinner meal vegetable intake for any of the nine strategies. However, pairwise comparisons for the intervention group showed that vegetable intake for the strategy of serving at least two vegetables for the dinner meal was greater than intake for two other strategies: 'Pair vegetables with other foods child likes" "Eat dinner together with an adult(s) modeling vegetable consumption". Caregivers indicated that the strategies were generally not difficult to implement. For Objective 2, three 24-hour dietary recalls were collected at baseline and study conclusion from children to assess changes in overall vegetable intake. Also, at baseline and study conclusion, children and caregivers provided liking scores for 36 different vegetable types on a10-point labeled hedonic scale (1-Hate it to 10-Like it a lot, or "Never tried"). For the same 36 different vegetable types, home vegetable availability data were collected at baseline and study conclusion. Change in total daily vegetable intake (baseline to study conclusion) was not different between intervention and control group. No differences were noted in changes (pre-post differences) in caregiver and child mean vegetable liking ratings when mean liking was assessed across all vegetables. There were also no changes in home vegetable availability from baseline to study conclusion between intervention and control group. Adolescent Involvement in Food Preparation. In the final study, the objective was to understand how low-income adolescents are involved in home food preparation. At the conclusion of Phase 2, if an adolescent (13-18 years) was present in the home, he or she was invited to participate in a semi-structured interview. Interview questions inquired about how adolescents were involved in food preparation. Interviews (n = 19) were analyzed using grounded theory methodology. Three levels of involvement in food preparation were described. Eight adolescents were highly involved with responsibility for cooking for others in the household. When deciding what to prepare at mealtimes, they considered preferences of others, variety, nutrition, and time. Some adolescents were highly involved in food preparation out of family obligation and cultural expectations. Those highly involved in food preparation indicated that the additional responsibilities produced stress. They also indicated that they were confident in their ability to cook without the assistance of an adult. Adolescents who were moderately involved in food preparation (n = 7) assisted with cooking. They reported that they enjoyed cooking. Four adolescents had low levels of involvement in food preparation and rarely, if ever, helped their caregiver with cooking. They were not expected or encouraged to be involved in food preparation by parents.Item Consumer Food Choices and the Value of Time(2018-12) Short, GiannaThe foods we eat are a special class of commodities that we must physically consume and metabolize in order to live. Intuitively, people understand that time--or lack thereof--plays a role in their food choices. Yet, time is often left out of consumer food choices modeled in economics. This dissertation seeks to gain improved insight about food consumption decisions by exploring their temporal nature. Part I approaches food and time from a behavioral economics perspective through an experiment designed to estimate the temporal discount rate for food consumption. Parts II and III are an in-depth exploration of how to incorporate the opportunity cost of time into food demand systems. The first approach (Part II) incorporates leisure time as a good into a complete demand system to eliminate the opportunity cost bias and estimate the elasticity of substitution between food and leisure. The second approach (Part III) develops and tests two methods to correct for the opportunity cost of preparation time using food purchase data alone.Item Habit Formation for Parenting Practices Designed to Change Youth Vegetable Intake(2017-05) Ritter, AllisonObjective: To evaluate habit formation for parenting practices to improve child vegetable intake. Study Design: Within group, pre-/post- test design, low-income parent/child pairs (n = 44). Six practices intended to be implemented at home to encourage child vegetable consumption were incorporated into 6 Cooking Matters for Families classes. Outcome Measures and Analysis: Habit strength was measured one week after introduction and immediately post-intervention using a Self-Report Habit Index. Paired t-tests were used to compare habit strength for the 6 strategies. Multiple regression models were created for each strategy to determine associations between habit strength and environmental, behavioral, and individual factors. Results: Habit strength increased from post-introduction to post-intervention for 3 practices. Four mediating variables significantly predicted habit strength. Conclusions: This approach was effective in helping parents develop habitual practices to encourage vegetable consumption among children. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether these habitual practices can improve child vegetable intake.Item Transforming the School Cafeteria Environment in Hennepin County(University of Minnesota Extension, 2013-10) Lovett, Kathleen; Caskey, Mary; Schroeder, Mary; Kunkel, KellyIn an effort to decrease chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and heart disease, Hennepin County Public Health secured a five-year Community Transformation Grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As part of this grant, Hennepin County Public Health recognized a need to ensure food service staff are properly trained to support healthy eating initiatives such as increasing student intake of fruits and vegetables. Extension’s strong history of impactful school food service trainings, Hennepin County Public Health contracted with Extension’s school food service team to conduct trainings. Training objectives include: 1) Improving the culinary skills of foodservice staff to prepare fruits and vegetables, including locally grown, that appeal to students; 2) implementing behavioral economic techniques to increase student consumption of fruits and vegetables. To date, this training has been conducted in seven school districts reaching more than 400 participants.