Browsing by Subject "Weed control"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Agricultural Engineering News Letter, number 95(University of Minnesota, Division of Agricultural Extension, 1940-02) University of Minnesota, Agricultural Extension Division.; Schwantes, A.J.Item Controlling Leafy Spurge and Canada Thistle by Competitive Species(1994-06) Biesboer, David D.; Darveaux, Bettina; Koukkari, Willard L.A study was performed to assess the use of perennial native grasses in the control of leafy spurge and Canada thistle and also to evaluate the effects of herbicides applied during the fall to leafy spurge crown buds. As part of an integrated vegetation management program, grass treatments containing the native prairie grass little bluestem established well and were effective at reducing the cover of leafy spurge. Paramount to the success of using native grass species is getting adequate grass establishment which necessitates the careful selection of grass species adapted to the specific site conditions. A fall application of the herbicide picloram at 0.5 and 1.0 lb ai/acre was very effective at controlling leafy spurge and may be mediated via the direct absorption of picloram by the elongated crown buds at this time. The report contains an extensive literature review of the biology and weed control efforts of both leafy spurge and Canada thistle.Item Implementation of Methodology for Weed Management Practices – Phase II(Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2009-09) Arika, Caleb N.; Wyse, Donald L.; Nieber, John L.; Moon, Roger D.In 2008 a Phase II implementation project was conducted to test whether presence/absence surveys could provide accurate and cost effective estimates of invasive weed species infestation in roadway rights-of-way within Mn/DOT District 4. A 225-ft survey, in which infested areas were mapped, was used as the standard for comparison to the presence/absence surveys which were conducted using 14-ft ‘stick walks’. A 2007 Phase I project had shown the presence/absence surveys to be more cost effective, but the infestation estimates were consistently lower than the standard. The 2008 study provided additional data to test the efficacy of the presence/absence surveys. The results of the 2008 study showed that the presence/absence surveys were significantly less costly than the standard, but the estimates of infestation themselves were not satisfactory relative to the standard scheme. From this study it is concluded that surveys should be conducted using the 225-ft sampling scheme for invasive species that form contiguous patches. The lower cost of the presence/absence surveying scheme might make it a good option for sampling of invasive weed species infestations for the case of rare species such as poison ivy which do not typically form contiguous patches.