Browsing by Subject "Northshore Mining"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pellet Fines Removal System
    (University of Minnesota Duluth, 2005-09-13) Kiesel, Richard F
    The primary objective of this research project was to test a portable, larger scale version of the prototype NRRI Fines Removal System, previously developed at the Coleraine Minerals Research Laboratory, at a fired pellet feed rate of 150-250 LTPH or higher at Minnesota Taconite operations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Screen Performance Optimization : Part 28: Derrick Corporation
    (University of Minnesota Duluth, 2003-09-03) Larson, Thomas R
    The Derrick Corporation participated in this project in a slig~1tly different way. Rather than ship machines to the Coleraine Minerals Research Laboratory pilot plant, two drums of each sample were shipped to the Derrick Corporation laboratory in Buffalo, New York. In addition, Derrick requested that two machines be tested rather than one, so that a previous technology could be compared with the new. Both changes in protocol were approved by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, for which acknowledgment and thanks are certainly due. Using the feed samples, Derrick staff optimized the separations in an initial series of tests. From these tests, the optimum solids, panel sizes, and other relevant operating conditions were selected before formal test sequences began. The scope of work for this project follows the pattern set in Part 1, in which five tests were completed on each of two feed samples, one from Hibbing Taconite, and one from Northshore Mining. In this case, the number of tests is doubled again to apply to two different screening machines. Part 2 also includes silica and magnetic iron assays on head samples as well as on each size fraction. The separation criteria for these tests was to achieve a split near 100 microns for the Hibbing Taconite material, and an undersize grade close to 90% -325 mesh for the Northshore Mining material. After the panels were selected and other operating issues were decided, the formal test sequence involved using two values for feed rate and two values of feed solids that were just higher and just lower than in the initial tests. The idea was to bracket the optimum separation and measure the variation in screen performance as these two parameters varied. For each machine sample combination, the four tests were completed in a 2x2 pattern, and a fifth test was a repetition of one of the first four in order to measure experimental error.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Screen Performance Optimization: Part 2a: Smart Screen Systems
    (University of Minnesota Duluth, 2003-09-03) Larson, Thomas R
    A Smart Screen Systems screening device was installed in the pilot plant at the Coleraine Mineral Research Laboratory. As installed, the machine holds one pre-tensioned panel at 25-degrees from horizontal. Currently, single or two panel machines are available, and can be manufactured at the deck angle required for optimum performance. The effective screen cloth surface area on the pre-tensioned panels was 43" wide by 34" long, and the feed stream was distributed evenly along the 43" wide surface. The panel installation system was very simple, consisting of six cams used to hold an edge bracket onto the panel. A single individual can change a panel in just a few minutes. The scope of work for this project follows the pattern set in Part 1, in which five tests were completed on each of two feed samples, one from Hibbing Taconite, and one from Northshore Mining. The scope of work for Part 2 also includes silica and magnetic iron assays on head samples as well as on each size fraction. Otherwise, the test plan was identical to the previous part. For each material, initial tests were completed to achieve the established separation criteria as in Part 1. These criteria were to achieve a split at near 100 microns for the Hibbing Taconite material, and to achieve an undersize grade close to 90% -325 mesh for the Northshore Mining material. Once the panel was selected and other operating issues were resolved, a formal test sequence was conducted using two values for feed rate and two values of feed solids that were just higher and just lower than in the initial tests. The idea was to bracket the optimum separation and measure the variation in screen performance as these two parameters varied. As seen in Table 1, the four tests were completed in a 2x2 pattern, and a fifth test was a repetition of one of the first four in order to measure experimental error.