Browsing by Subject "Language revitalization"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Examining the Role of Family Education within Language Revitalization(2014) Shields, Sanna Mourita; Rauschenfels, DianeUnderstanding how to extend language learning beyond the classroom and into the home and family life of the enrolled preschool students in an Indigenous language immersion program is the focus of this study. The study explored the role of family education in language revitalization by asking families to describe their children’s target language learning outside of school; if the parents/caregivers feel able to support their children’s language acquisition without studying the language themselves; which types of resources they are most likely to engage with to facilitate second language acquisition; and what strategies parents/caregivers use to learn the language alongside their children. The results of this study show the limited language background of many parents/caregivers of enrolled immersion program students; outline motivating factors for language revitalization participation; identify activity based family programming and time spent in the immersion classroom as favored strategies for parents/caregivers to learn the target language and find that lack of time and energy are limitations faced by families to participate in family educational programming. Addressing the language fluency deficiencies within the adult population of Indigenous speaking communities as well as moving language use into wider daily practice have also been addressed by this study.Item Revitalizing language, reframing expertise: An ecological study of language in one teacher-learner's Ojibwe classroom(2017-05) Engman, MelissaThe demand for Ojibwe language education is outpacing the current number of ‘first speakers’ in the United States (Treuer, 2010). This inverse relationship between the number of learners and the number of fluent speakers means most teachers involved in Ojibwe language education are themselves language learners with varying levels of proficiency. Nevertheless, the experiences, practices, and ideologies of the ‘teacher-learner’ (Hinton, 2003) have received little attention despite their central role in the success of classroom-based, K-12 language programs. This study addresses this gap in the literature through an ethnographic and sociocultural analysis of language use within one teacher-learner’s Ojibwe kindergarten classroom. It examines classroom language and interaction, participant structures, and routines, documenting the languages and discourses that are used for academic, social, and spiritual purposes. It employs linguistic ethnography (LE) to first present a descriptive picture of the linguistic ecology of the classroom along with the teacher-learner’s practices and strategies. LE is then combined with critical discourse analysis (CDA) to unpack the beliefs and ideologies that shape these practices. Findings show how the teacher-learner’s reliance on routines and matrix-language framing to scaffold her own language opens up discursive space for learners to experiment, play, and relate to one another in English and Ojibwemowin. Furthermore, this study highlights the ideological constraints and openings that shape the learning and use of an Indigenous language within a colonial institution (school) that has long been a tool of assimilation and Indigenous language erasure. This study incorporates experiential knowledge from Indigenous educators and critiques of applied linguistics from Indigenous scholars to call attention to the obstacles and innovations that arise as multilingual Ojibwe language learners and their teacher(-learner) negotiate new terrain in classroom-based language revitalization. Findings provide a better understanding of how language teaching and use function in teacher-learner-led classrooms with implications for both language revitalization research and the development of heteroglossic Indigenous identities. Moreover, the inclusion of oft-dismissed Indigenous epistemology speaks back to the field of applied linguistics, arguing for an increased openness and commitment to difference and flexibility in multilingual language teaching and learning theory.