Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.

Browsing by Subject "Healthcare Quality"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Measuring Quality of Diabetes Care for Medicare Beneficiaries
    (2013-05) Parashuram, Shriram
    This dissertation consists of three papers studying existing practices in measuring quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries that warrant further examination. Quality of diabetes care is currently reported at the practice or plan level as a composite, summarizing multiple binary measures in the diabetes measure set. Medicare's Accountable Care organization demonstration uses an all-or-none approach deeming only diabetics who receive all measures in the diabetes care measure set to have met the quality threshold. This approach while simple might not be as meaningful as a graduated approach. Other approaches to composite quality measurement, like Medicare's value based payment system for physicians, add up binary measures in the diabetes care measure set, weighting them equally. But all measures in the set might not be equally important for quality, making the case for weighting measures accordingly. Finally, Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) offers incentive payments to physicians for reporting quality for their patients. In the absence of incentives for outcomes, the impact of reporting on outcomes is questionable. The dissertation employs Medicare administrative claims to answer the above questions. Paper 1 compares prediction of subsequent outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries using all-or-none approach against a graduated approach to quality measurement. Paper 2 compares measure weights for diabetes care processes obtained using three alternate approaches to weighting composites, to study whether equal weighting is justified in practice. Paper 3 studies whether PQRS quality reporting for diabetics is linked to receipt of more recommended diabetes care processes and better outcomes. This dissertation ultimately emphasizes the need to better understand quality mechanisms to measure it appropriately for quality improvement.