Browsing by Subject "Eating"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Effects Of Type Of Social Control Strategy And Perceived Agent Motivations On Eating And Relational Behaviors In Romantic Relationships Over Time(2020-05) Huelsnitz, ChloeOne of the ways in which close relationship partners can affect each other’s health behavior is by enacting social control, in which partners intentionally try to change each other’s behavior by using specific social control strategies. Most research has distinguished between the effects of different strategies on intrapersonal factors, such as individuals’ emotions, motivation, and health behavior, rather than considering the interpersonal context in which social control is embedded. This dissertation research addresses this gap by examining how the strategies that one partner uses to try to improve the other’s eating behavior elicit relational and eating responses over time. Study 1 used an iterative hypothetical scenario to experimentally test whether the effects of different social control strategies (autonomy-supporting versus autonomy-limiting) on relational and eating behavior are moderated by individuals’ perceptions of their partners’ motives for enacting social control (independent versus interdependent). Study 1 results showed that although there were few moderating effects of individuals’ perceptions of their partners’ motives on relational behaviors or healthiness of eating, autonomy-supporting strategies were associated with more constructive relational behaviors after the first use of social control and healthier eating over time. Study 2 used a daily diary approach to obtain descriptive information on the use of social control in relationships and to examine how different strategies elicit different relational and eating behaviors. Study 2 showed that partners enact more social control than previous research has shown and that partners often use both autonomy-supporting and autonomy-limiting social control strategies. Study 2 also showed that on days when individuals perceived that their partner had more interdependent motives, they engaged in more constructive relational behavior and reported healthier perceptions of their eating, but not healthier eating behavior. Additionally, autonomy-supporting social control was associated with more constructive relational behaviors, healthier perceptions of eating and healthier eating behaviors the first time the strategies were used, but not over time. Together, these studies utilize a novel iterative scenario methodology and longitudinal assessments to examine both relational and health responses to social control and show that autonomy-supporting, but not autonomy-limiting social control has implications for relationships and health behavior.Item Emotion regulation and health behavior: effects of negative affect and emotion regulation strategies on eating and smoking(2013-02) Keenan, Nora KathleenNegative affect (NA) and deficits in emotion regulation (ER) are associated with poorer behavioral self-regulation across multiple health domains. Specifically, people who report more NA and have difficulty regulating negative emotions are more likely to engage in emotional eating and eating disordered behavior. Among smokers, NA is associated with higher rates of smoking and more difficulty with cessation. Though ER approaches vary in effectiveness, implementing ER strategies is one promising way of improving self-regulation of eating and other health behaviors. The current research compares the effects of several ER strategies on distress and eating behavior (Study 1), and compares ER skills of smokers versus nonsmokers (Study 2). In Study 1, participants (N = 114) were assigned to one of four ER conditions (suppression, cognitive reappraisal, mindfulness, and a no-instruction control), watched a movie clip to induce NA, and completed a tasting activity. Results showed that, compared to mindfulness or reappraisal, suppression was associated with eating more sweets; furthermore, this effect was stronger for those people naturally tending toward suppression or emotional eating. Study 2 compared ER profiles of daily smokers (N = 99) and nonsmokers from Study 1 (N = 114). Results indicated that, compared to nonsmokers, smokers had significantly poorer ER skills and relied on less effective ER strategies (e.g., suppression). In sum, this research provides a stepping-stone toward improved interventions to facilitate behavioral change processes by linking habitual ER vulnerabilities to health risk behaviors and providing a controlled lab-based test of different ER strategies on health behavior regulation.Item Who eats their feelings, and who sweats them out?: Understanding how individuals and their romantic partners use eating and exercise for emotion regulation(2022-04) Jones, RachaelResearchers argue that individuals’ emotion regulation affects their long-term health outcomes by leading them to engage in health behaviors to cope with their stress and negative emotions. However, there is a need to isolate health behavior for this purpose from individuals’ typical health behavior, and to include health-promoting behaviors, such as exercise, in addition to health-compromising behaviors, such as eating junk food. Furthermore, emotion regulation and health behavior often occur around close others and are influenced by them, highlighting the need to study the social context around these processes. Thus, this dissertation examines how individuals’ and their romantic partners’ emotion regulation and typical health behavior predict their use of eating and exercise to down-regulate negative emotion. Participants reported their typical health habits and use of eating and exercise for emotion regulation, including how frequently they engaged in the behaviors and how they deviated from their typical health behavior when doing so. Participants’ balanced (i.e., constructive and effective) emotion regulation was measured by well-established self-report surveys as well as by their behavior during conflict discussions with their romantic partners, which was coded by trained observers. The results indicated that balanced emotion regulation was not related to individuals’ typical health behavior but was related to their health behavior for emotion regulation. Furthermore, participants reported significantly changing their typical health behavior when using it to cope. Actor Partner Interdependence Model regressions revealed that participants lower in self-reported balanced emotion regulation engaged in eating for emotion regulation more frequently than those higher, especially if they were women. Their typical junk food consumption was not predictive. In contrast, those who typically exercised more in their daily lives used exercise for emotion regulation more frequently than those who exercised less. They also tended to increase their exercise more when using it to regulate their emotions, especially if they were men. Balanced emotion regulation was not related to individuals’ use of exercise to manage their feelings, although those higher in balanced emotion regulation used exercise significantly more often than they used eating for this purpose. Individuals’ partners’ tendencies were sometimes associated with individuals’ eating for emotion regulation, but not with their exercise. Self-reported balanced emotion regulation was more strongly related to other variables than was behavioral balanced emotion regulation. These findings suggest that health behavior for emotion regulation differs from typical health behavior, more dysregulated individuals may eat (but not exercise) more often to cope with their negative feelings, and experience with exercise may be needed to employ physical activity for emotion regulation.