Repository logo
Log In

University Digital Conservancy

University Digital Conservancy

Communities & Collections
Browse
About
AboutHow to depositPolicies
Contact

Browse by Subject

  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Dissolved Organic Carbon"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The sampling error of organic carbon field measurements in Lake Superior
    (2015-08) Forsman, Brandy
    In June 2013, a test of sample processing steps was undertaken for limnological/oceanographic sampling of total organic carbon (TOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM). This was to determine the magnitude and sources of errors in the sampling of these organic carbon field measurements. Replicate Niskin rosette casts in Lake Superior (with a difference of 0.79 km in site location and 1 hour 6 min in sampling time) were found to be significantly different at both alpha= 0.05 and 0.10 for DOC, TOC, e2/e3, and CDOM, but not POC. The TOC, DOC and POC average concentration and the standard deviation of all replicates of the two casts was 2.3 +/- 0.2, 2.3 +/- 0.3, and 0.14 +/- 0.02 mg/L respectively. The variation due to sample handling within one cast for DOC and TOC is 0.1 mg/L or 5% relative standard deviation. For POC, the variation is 0.02 mg/L or 14%. Use of different Niskins from the same cast did not cause significant effects.

UDC Services

  • About
  • How to Deposit
  • Policies
  • Contact

Related Services

  • University Archives
  • U of M Web Archive
  • UMedia Archive
  • Copyright Services
  • Digital Library Services

Libraries

  • Hours
  • News & Events
  • Staff Directory
  • Subject Librarians
  • Vision, Mission, & Goals
University Libraries

© 2025 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Policy statement | Acceptable Use of IT Resources | Report web accessibility issues