Browsing by Subject "Clinical"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item A clinical and biomechanical profile of female athletes with and without patellofemoral pain.(2009-12) Swanson, Karen JaneFemale athletes may exhibit unique risks and orthopedic presentations when engaging in physical activity. Gender differences have been noted in the incidences of particular knee injuries, with female athletes/runners reported to be two times more likely to present with patellofemoral disorders as their male counterparts. Unfortunately, the etiology of patellofemoral pain (PFP) remains elusive and multifactorial. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical and biomechanical profiles of female athletes with and without PFP during walking and running to determine if there is a set of variables that differentiates the groups. Forty-three subjects with moderate PFP and forty-five control subjects with no history of PFP participated in one 60 minute testing session. Each participant completed a series of questionnaires and was assessed for height, weight and activity level. A Modified Thomas test, Modified Ober test and straight leg raise assessment were performed bilaterally looking for differences between the right and left limbs. Pelvis and hip range of motion, maximum vertical ground reaction force, contact time, and center of pressure variability (COPx) were measured during 30 second treadmill walk and run trials utilizing a 9-camera motion analysis system and a Pedar insole system. The symmetry index (SI) (Robinson et al., 1987) was used to characterize asymmetry of kinematic and kinetic variables of both groups. Two clinical indices [Tightness Index (TI) and Pelvic Symmetry Index (PSI)] were established based on results of the Modified Thomas and Ober tests. Based on logistic regression results, we found that the TI and PSI clearly differentiated the two groups with the PFP group displaying significantly greater numbers of positive signs within both indices (p<.001). Biomechanical variables did not clearly define the groups, however, there was some evidence that measurement of the mediolateral variability of the COPx/gait line might indicate lower extremity kinetic chain instability as seen at the foot and ankle during activity (p=.07 during walking; p=.013 during running). The results of this study suggest that there is a significant association between the results of the TI and PSI and PFP. Clinically, the tests are quick and easy to perform and may be helpful in distinguishing those at risk for PFP.Item The clinical practices of medical family therapists(2013-05) Zubatsky, James M.Although mental health professionals use the biopsychosocial approach and make collaborations with other providers in their practice, there is a lack of evidence in how effective Medical Family Therapists (MedFTs) are in their practice patterns with patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical practices of Medical Family Therapists, investigating how likely MedFTs assessed for biopsychosocial issues in patients and what potential referrals for treatment were made. A purposeful and snowball sampling method resulted in 84 participants taking part in an online survey, recruited through various list serves, organizations and educational institutions. Although none of the author's hypotheses regarding participants making a biposychosocial assessment or referral for treatment were confirmed, MedFTs were more inclined to refer to medical providers than any other professional in the patient's treatment after an initial assessment. Mental health professionals who consider themselves MedFTs may benefit from additional training or coursework when using this model in their practice.Item Understanding the benefits and limitations of magnetic nanoparticle heating for improved applications in cancer hyperthermia and biomaterial cryopreservation(2013-12) Etheridge, Michael LaurenceThe current work focused on the ability of magnetic nanoparticles to produce heat in the presence of an applied alternating magnetic field. Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia applications utilize this behavior to treat cancer and this approach has received clinical approval in the European Union, but significant developments are necessary for this technology to have a chance for wider-spread acceptance.Here then we begin by investigating some of the important limitations of the current technology. By characterizing the ability of superparamagnetic and ferromagnetic nanoparticles to heat under a range of applied fields, we are able to determine the optimal field settings for clinical application and make recommendations on the highest impact strategies to increase heating. In addition, we apply these experimentally determined limits to heating in a series of heat transfer models, to demonstrate the therapeutic impact of nanoparticle concentration, target volume, and delivery strategy.Next, we attempt to address one of the key questions facing the field- what is the impact of biological aggregation on heating? Controlled aggregate populations are produced and characterized in ionic and protein solutions and their heating is compared with nanoparticles incubated in cellular suspensions. Through this investigation we are able to demonstrate that aggregation is responsible for up to a 50% decrease in heating. However, more importantly, we are able to demonstrate that the observed reductions in heating correlate with reductions in longitudinal relaxation (T1) measured by sweep imaging with Fourier transformation (SWIFT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), providing a potential platform to account for these aggregation effects and directly predict heating in a clinical setting.Finally, we present a new application for magnetic nanoparticle heating, in the thawing of cryopreserved biomaterials. A number of groups have demonstrated the ability to rapidly cool and preserve tissues in the vitreous state, but crystallization and cracking failures occur upon the subsequent thaw. Magnetic nanoparticles offer a potential solution to these issues, through their ability to provide rapid, uniform heating, and we illustrate this through heating in several cryoprotectant solutions and by modeling the effects of heating at the bulk and micro-scales.Item The validity of judgment : can the assessor learn to outperform the equation?(2010-09) Klieger, David M.When judgments (i.e., predictions of outcomes) are incorrect, the negative consequences for individuals, organizations, and society can be serious. For various kinds of outcomes, meta-analyses and literature reviews reveal, time and again, that the predictive validity of information combined in the mind of the assessor ("clinical data combination") is smaller than the predictive validity when the information is combined using an equation or actuarial table ("mechanical data combination"). Therefore, using mechanical approaches instead of clinical ones would seem prudent. However, judgment validity encompasses consequential validity as well as predictive accuracy. Furthermore, even some of the scholars who have emphasized the superior accuracy of mechanical methods admit that it may be possible for a judge to systematically out-predict a mechanical method. One such possible approach is configural reasoning, an assessor's use of a functional form (e.g. an interaction) absent from the mechanical method and yet predictive of the outcome. As indicated by the aforementioned studies indicating the superior accuracy of mechanical combination, judges do not productively employ such techniques in general. Nevertheless, it remains an empirical question whether assessors can be taught to utilize configural reasoning to outperform an equation. In addition, it is important to determine the traits of those individuals who predict and learn to predict most accurately, because identifying such people can minimize the costs of error and training. This dissertation tries to be comprehensive in scope. It employs experimental designs and methods of assessing individual differences to answer questions about the degree (if any) to which people can be taught to outperform a mechanical equation, the degree (if any) to which assessors can learn to improve the accuracy of their judgments, the degree (if any) to which judges can be made less overconfident in their judgment strategies, the relationship of any changes in accuracy to any changes in confidence, the individual differences that define those who predict and learn to predict most accurately, and the timing of and extent to which (if any) assessors gain insight about the most accurate predictive approach. Prior to addressing these issues, this dissertation lays certain groundwork. It clarifies the nomological networks for clinical and mechanical combination. It enumerates much of the vast research that reveals the human cognitive limitations and informational barriers that are thought to contribute to a vicious cycle of lesser clinical accuracy and overconfidence in judgment strategies. Furthermore, it discusses why one should even care about clinical combination if mechanical procedures are generally more accurate. The most extensive background information provided prior to discussion of the studies conducted by this author concerns the Lens Model as a toolkit for measuring accuracy as well as the determinants of accuracy. Although this portion of the dissertation is somewhat detailed and intricate, it is necessary. First, understanding the Lens Model leads to understanding the determinants of judgment accuracy. Second, understanding the Lens Model leads to understanding how the judge can and cannot outperform the mechanical approach. Third, understanding the Lens Model leads to understanding the limitations of prior research. Fourth, understanding the Lens Model is essential if the reader is to fully understand results, discussion, and conclusions of the author's experiments. Also reviewed are the "skill score" as an alternative to the Lens Model for measuring accuracy as well as the major considerations involved when teaching people to improve their accuracy and lessen in confidence. The "skill score" provides information about elevation and scatter that is not available from the Lens Model. Final preliminaries focus on experimental design, namely how and why use of a disordinal interaction is central to the experiments conducted by the author, as well as issues concerning the number of experimental cues (predictors) employed, cue redundancy (intercorrelation), the importance of representative design in the experiments, the conduciveness of various types of experimental feedback to learning, and the impact of incentives on judgment accuracy in the experiments. The author conducted two studies - one in Fall 2009 and another in Spring 2010. Although some of the experimental design details of the studies differed in important ways, their general blueprints were quite similar. Using mostly undergraduate subjects at the University of Minnesota, both studies collected information about individual differences (cognitive ability, gender, personality, interests, and experience). In the experimental portions of the studies, subjects were asked to make predictions of job performance for hypothetical job candidates based on the cognitive ability test score for each candidate as well as how interesting or boring the candidate was expected to find the job. The most accurate clinical prediction strategy would involve applying knowledge that the correlation between cognitive ability and job performance was positive when the applicant was expected to find the job interesting but negative when the applicant was expected to find the job boring (i.e. a disordinal interaction). The competing mechanical model was a linear version of a model that incorporated the disordinal interaction. Subjects were asked about their confidence in how accurately they were making predictions, and in order to assess insight, subjects were asked to narratively self-report the nature of their judgment strategies. Data were analyzed using longitudinal hierarchical linear modeling (for within-person change over time in accuracy, the determinants of accuracy, and confidence), correlation (for between-person differences), and frequencies (mainly for evaluating insight). Results were fascinating, although many were inconclusive (often due to lack of statistical significance). Although subjects could outperform the mechanical model under certain experimental conditions, this superiority was not statistically significant. Some of the individuals, experimental groups, and/or subject pool means increased or declined in accuracy, the determinants of accuracy, and confidence over time as expected, but often these results were not statistically significant. Nevertheless, there was some evidence that criterion-related feedback about the disordinal interaction led to improved accuracy and decreased confidence while lack of it had the opposite effects. Several individual differences were significantly associated with accuracy, with cognitive ability being the difference most pervasively related to accuracy to a statistically significant degree. Findings for insight were complicated by the inconsistent nature of subjects' narratives. Nevertheless, there was relatively high agreement between raters of subjects' insight, and ratings of insight often had statistically significant correlations with objective measures of accuracy. Moreover, insight as variously measured was often achieved, and if achieved was usually achieved early.