Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.

Browsing by Subject "Active Flutter Suppression"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Stability Augmentation and Active Flutter Suppression of a Flexible Flying-Wing Drone
    (2015-05-19) Schmidt, David
    Integrated control laws are developed for stability augmentation and active flutter suppression (AFS) of a flexible, flying-wing drone. The vehicle is a 12-pound unmanned, flying- wing research aircraft with a 10 ft wingspan. AFS is flight critical since the subject vehicle is designed to flutter within its flight envelope. The critical flutter condition involves aeroelastic interactions between the rigid-body and elastic degrees of freedom; hence the control laws must simultaneously address both rigid-body stability augmentation and flutter suppression. The control-synthesis approach is motivated by the concept of Identically Located Force and Acceleration (ILAF), successfully applied on some previous operational aircraft. Based on the flutter characteristics and on conventional stability-augmentation concepts, two simple loop closures are suggested. It is shown that this control architecture robustly stabilizes the body- freedom-flutter condition, increases the damping of the second aeroelastic mode (which becomes a second flutter mode at higher velocity), and provides reasonably conventional vehicle pitch- attitude response. The critical factors limiting the performance of the feedback system are identified to be the bandwidth of the surface actuators and the pitch effectiveness of the control surfaces.