Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.

Browsing by Author "Dolata, Rosemary Dawn"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Addressing the barriers to sustainable design in the process of developing multifamily affordable housing in Minnesota.
    (2011-12) Dolata, Rosemary Dawn
    Sustainable design balances the economic, social, and environmental needs of today with those of the future. This is not an abstract concept. Examples of very sustainable developments exist today. If design professionals possess the skills to design sustainable projects, and the benefits of being sustainable are so clearly accessible, why do sustainably designed projects remain the exception rather than the norm? Focusing on affordable multifamily rental housing as a project type, this paper documents the specific barriers that deter the incorporation of sustainable design in the development process. Examples of tools that successfully promote sustainable design and recommendations to further improve the incorporation of sustainable design practices are also included. The paper begins with a review of existing scholarship citing research from England, Scotland, and Saudi Arabia. These findings provide a point of reference for the author’s original research, which was gathered through interviews with well-established nonprofit developers of multifamily affordable housing in Minnesota. Barriers uncovered include: funding limitations, site and project specific issues, limited data and expertise, regulations and requirements, relationships/collaborations, sustainable design standards, and issues unique to Minnesota. Examples of successful tools for promoting sustainable design include: community involvement, statutory regulations, demonstration projects / competitions, sustainable design standards, and local expertise and integrated design / design charrettes. Recommendations from previous scholarship and Minnesota developers focused on the following: awareness and education, building occupants, research, replicating success, collaboration, and funder opportunities. The author concludes with five specific recommendations: increase funding, expand education, support research, promote collaboration, and change the funding process.