Browsing by Author "Arnold, William"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Banking Groundwater - A study examining aquifer storage and recovery for groundwater sustainability in Minnesota
    Bilotta, John P.; Arnold, William; Kang, Peter; Seonkyoo, Yoon; Shandilya, Raghwendra N.; Bresciani, Etienne; Lee, Seunghak; Kirk, Josh; Levers, Lucia; Bohman, Brian; Kirby, Eileen; Runkel, Anthony; Xiang, Galen; Gassman, Phillip; Valcu-Lisman, Adriana; Jennings, Carrie E.; jbilotta@umn.edu; Bilotta, John P; University of Minnesota Water Resources Center; Freshwater
    Some of the more than 75% of Minnesotans who rely on groundwater may find it in short supply in the face of population, land-use and climate change. Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is a technological approach to treat and inject clean water into an aquifer for temporary storage. The hydrogeological characteristics and the chemistry of the source water and aquifer impact treatment needs prior to injection and after extraction. Aquifer properties that control how water moves determine the volume and rate of water injected. This study examined four different kinds of aquifers across Minnesota with unique pressures to determine their suitability for ASR. The study findings suggest three may be suitable for ASR. The Buffalo aquifer in Moorhead has variable injection capacity and multiple sources of water for injection. Water quality issues of arsenic, sulfate, manganese, and hardness would require treatment after extraction. The Jordan aquifer in Rochester faces increased pressure from growth and nitrate contamination in the surrounding agricultural areas. The wastewater treatment plant could provide adequate source water if treated. Woodbury faces pressure from increasing population and PFAS contamination of the Jordan aquifer. ASR could recharge groundwater from wastewater treatment plants and also be integrated with PFAS remediation scenarios by reinjection of treated groundwater. ASR is not recommended for the surficial sand aquifer in the Straight River Groundwater Management area in north central Minnesota because there is no source of water to make it a feasible option at this time. Cost-benefit analysis combined with a sensitivity analysis of economic factors should be a component of ASR project feasibility. Modified state well code and a streamlined permitting path would allow more successful development and deployment of ASR. State adoption of control over Class V injection wells from the USEPA is also necessary.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sedimentary Record of Antibiotic Accumulation in Minnesota Lakes
    (2018-01-29) Arnold, William A; Kerrigan, Jill F; Sandberg, Kyle; Engstrom, Daniel R; LaPara, Tim; arnol032@umn.edu; Arnold, William; Arnold, William
    The widespread detection of antibiotics in the environment is concerning because antibiotics are designed to be effective at small doses. The objective of this work was to quantify the accumulation rates of antibiotics used by humans and animals, spanning several major antibiotic classes (sulfonamides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides), in Minnesota lake-sediment cores. Our goal was to determine temporal trends, the major anthropogenic source to these lacustrine systems, and the importance of natural production. A historical record of usage trends for ten human and/or animal-use antibiotics (four sulfonamides, three fluoroquinolones, one macrolide, trimethoprim, and lincomycin) was faithfully captured in the sediment cores. Nine other antibiotics were not detected. Ofloxacin, trimethoprim, sulfapyridine, and sulfamethazine were detected in all of the anthropogenically-impacted studied lakes. Maximum sediment fluxes reached 20.5 ng cm−2 yr−1 (concentration 66.1 ng/g) for ofloxacin, 1.2 ng cm−2 yr−1 (1.2 ng/g) for trimethoprim, 3.3 ng cm−2 yr−1 (11.3 ng/g) for sulfapyridine, and 1.0 ng cm−2 yr−1 (1.6 ng/g) for sulfamethazine, respectively. Natural production of lincomycin may have occurred in one lake at fluxes ranging from 0.4 to 1.8 ng cm−2 yr−1 (0.1 to 5.8 ng/g).Wastewater effluent appears to be the primary source of antibiotics in the studied lakes, with lesser inputs from agricultural activities.