Network Expansion Decision-making in the Twin Cities

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Published Date

Publisher

Transportation Research Board

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative analysis of the decision-rules used by jurisdictions in Minnesota's Twin Cities metropolitan area. Interviews were conducted with staff at the city, county, metropolitan, and state levels to determine how decisions about road investment, expansion and new construction were made. Flowcharts were developed to provide a more systematic way of presenting that information. Most jurisdictions do not have extensive public participation processes, though several, notably the Metropolitan Council, Hennepin and Ramsey Counties and the City of Minneapolis do. Jurisdictions with public participation have the most formal and extensive documentation of their investment decision process. The decision factors vary by jurisdiction, though safety, capacity, and pavement quality were important throughout.

Keywords

Description

Related to

item.page.replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Nexus Papers;200608

Funding Information

item.page.isbn

DOI identifier

http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1981-03

Previously Published Citation

Montes de Oca, Norah and David Levinson (2006) Network Expansion Decision-making in the Twin Cities. Journal of the Transportation Research Board: Transportation Research Record 1981 1-11.

Other identifiers

Suggested Citation

Montes de Oca, Norah. (2006). Network Expansion Decision-making in the Twin Cities. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1981-03.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.