Ramp Meters on Trial: Evidence from the Twin Cities Metering Holiday
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Authors
Published Date
Publisher
Elsevier
Type
Abstract
Ramp meters in the Twin Cities have been the subject of a recent test of their effectiveness, involving turning them off for 8 weeks. This paper analyzes the resultswith and without ramp metering for several representative freeways during the afternoon peak period. Seven performance measures: mobility, equity, productivity, consumers' surplus, accessibility, travel time variation and travel demand responses are compared. It is found that ramp meters are particularly helpful for long trips relative to short trips.Ramp metering, while generally beneficial to freeway segments, may not improve trip travel times (including ramp delays). The reduction in travel time variation comprisesanother benefit from ramp meters. Non-work trips and work trips respond differently to ramp meters. The results are mixed, suggesting a more refined ramp control algorithm,which explicitly considers ramp delay, is in order.
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Nexus Papers;200604
Funding information
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.12.004
Previously Published Citation
Levinson, David and Lei Zhang (2006) Ramp Meters on Trial: Evidence from the Twin Cities Metering Holiday. Transportation Research part A 40(10) 810-828.
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Levinson, David M; Zhang, Lei. (2006). Ramp Meters on Trial: Evidence from the Twin Cities Metering Holiday. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.12.004.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.