The role of road user costs in benefit-cost analysis.
2009-12
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
The role of road user costs in benefit-cost analysis.
Authors
Published Date
2009-12
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
An economically and socially healthy urban region always needs to move people and
goods in a timely fashion. However, with the development of urban land, many corridors
in urban regions suffer from great congestion, since demand is close to or greater
than the capacity of the roadways. In order to improve traffic conditions, transportation
planners need to identify and select the best projects that will expand and upgrade
existing facilities by using Benefit-Cost Analysis. Usually, Benefit-Cost Analysis assists
transportation planners by balancing the consideration of user benefits against the total
costs of the projects, by translating them into monetary terms. The principal elements
in Benefit-Cost Analysis are travel time costs, vehicle operation costs, and safety costs.
These elements of a Base Case are compared to those of one or more Project Alternatives
that offer significant improvements. However, the Road User Costs (RUC) during
construction, which have the same three components, is often ignored in Benefit Cost
Analysis. When RUC is significant, it can generate different results in a Benefit Costs
Analysis.
The objective of this study is to propose an improved process of Benefit-Cost Analysis,
evaluating investment costs and all user costs and benefits during construction
and during a facilities' lifetime. Furthermore, since comprehensive calculations of areawide
RUC during the construction phase are often lacking, this study also proposes
three procedures of user cost calculation by utilizing three levels of analytical tools:
one Sketch-Planning Tool (specifically, QuickZone); one Travel Demand Model (Cube
Voyager); and one Microscopic Simulator (AIMSUN). In order to implement this improved
procedure of Benefit-Cost Analysis, the TH-36 reconstruction project, in North
St Paul, Minnesota, was utilized. Through conducting Benefit-Cost Analysis of two
planned construction alternatives, Full Closure and Partial Closure, this study concluded
that RUC during the construction phase are important and the selection of an
optimal construction alternative can be different due to the inclusion of RUC.
Description
University of Minnesota M.S. thesis. December 2009. Major: Civil Engineering. Advisor: John Hourdos. 1 computer file (PDF); ix,149 pages. Ill. (some col.)
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Hong, Feili. (2009). The role of road user costs in benefit-cost analysis.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/59867.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.