Assessing the similarities and differences in the collaborative and integrated models of Minnesota’s Integrated Health Partnerships:
2018-05-09
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Assessing the similarities and differences in the collaborative and integrated models of Minnesota’s Integrated Health Partnerships:
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
2018-05-09
Publisher
Type
Thesis or Dissertation
Abstract
Minnesota is the first in the nation to set up an Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) covering Medicaid lives. It is called the Integrated Health Partnership (IHP) and aims to reform the challenges of healthcare quality and costs. The IHP model engages providers to create partnerships and quality initiatives for improved care with data analytics, control the total cost of care, and assume risk with the state. Through policy analysis, qualitative research and quantitative descriptors, this paper will explore the similarities and differences in the various IHP models and the requirements deemed necessary for systems to successfully assume risk in this market.
Description
Professional paper for the fulfillment of the Master of Public Affairs degree.
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Rippe, Sara Chapo. (2018). Assessing the similarities and differences in the collaborative and integrated models of Minnesota’s Integrated Health Partnerships:. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/208299.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.