Hovland, JaneDoane, MitziGilbertson, KenLufholm, Amanda L2012-12-212017-04-142012-12-212017-04-1420012001https://hdl.handle.net/11299/187533A Plan B paper submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota, Duluth, under the direction of Dr. Jane Hovland, in partial fulfillment of a requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Counseling Psychology, December 2001Committee names: Jane Hovland (Chair), H. Mitzi Doane, Kenneth Gilbertson.Follow-up studies of graduate programs can provide significant evaluative material to aid in program revision or enhancement. The present study reflects a survey of graduates of the UMD Counseling Psychology program (1995-2000). A response rate of 55.69% (n=44) was achieved. Results reflect rankings of adequacy and utility of courses and experiences in the program, as well as their relevance to current work settings. Settings reflect the preparation tracks in the program (school or community counseling). Graduates rated all courses above average, with individual counseling skills training and group counseling achieving the highest utility scores within the program. Least useful were statistics and research design, although graduates stated that their preparation in these areas was highly adequate. The paper addresses framework for program evaluation, keeping in mind the mission and philosophy of the Counseling Psychology Program. Recommendations for incorporating survey results into program improvements are discussed in relation to CACREP standards.enUMD Counseling Psychology programSchool counselingCommunity counselingCounseling skillsGraduate program evaluationGraduate studentsPlan Bs (project-based master's degrees)Master of ArtsMaster of Arts in Counseling PsychologyDepartment of PsychologyCollege of Education and Human Service ProfessionsUniversity of Minnesota DuluthCounseling psychology.Universities and colleges -- Graduate work -- Evaluation.Scholarly Text or Essay