Ly, KevinHan Li, PearlKoenig, MelissaBerry, Daniel2020-03-272020-03-272020https://hdl.handle.net/11299/212265Previous developmental work has shown that children have a robust preference for their own group members. Another line of research has found that children are able to track the reliability of others and selectively learn from individuals who appear to be more knowledgeable. In the current study, we aim to build on past research and test how group membership and epistemic trust interact. Specifically, using behavioral measures to explore how group membership and plausibility of the speakers’ claims may affect children’s learning decisions and social preferences. To examine these questions, 48 four- to five-year-old children were recruited, assigned to a color group using the minimal group membership paradigm and then presented with claims about novel and familiar objects. All participants were randomly assigned to one of two between-subject conditions: (1) an in-group condition where the in-group member provided counter-intuitive information; and (2) an out-group condition where an out-group member provided countervailing claims. To measure children’s social and learning preferences, we used selective learning, explicit liking, and resource allocation tasks.enIn-GroupGroup BiasTestimonialMinimal Group ParadigmEpistemic TrustCollege of Liberal ArtsInstitute of Child DevelopmentEarly Language and Experience LabPresentation