Bakker, CaitlinTheis-Mahon, NicoleBrown, Sarah Jane2022-09-082022-09-082022-09-08https://hdl.handle.net/11299/241503Data consists of two csv files for a set of 310 systematic reviews/evidence syntheses (methods of identification outlined in Brown et al.) Methodological quality of the systematic review/evidence synthesis was assessed using AMSTAR 2 criteria. Citation meaning was assessed using previous mapping of the Retraction Watch Database’s reason for retraction to a modified version of Bar Ilan and Halevi’s taxonomy of reasons for retraction. Image attribution: The image for this record is by Mohamed Mb and can be found on The Noun Project at https://thenounproject.com/icon/error-1678343/.Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/Data underlying (The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses)Dataset