Kramer, Gunnar RPeterson, Sean MDaly, Kyle OStreby, Henry MAndersen, David E2019-02-062019-02-062019-02-06https://hdl.handle.net/11299/201612See ReadMe.txt for detailed description of files. Files include model-predicted productivity for both species (raster), digitized land-cover type classification of study area (shapefile), predicted productivity of both species at observed nesting sites, and R code to make the statistical comparisons and produce the graphs in Kramer et al. (2019).Spatially explicit predicted reproductive output for golden-winged warblers and American woodcock at Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge, Minnesota, USA used to compare reproductive output of woodcock and warblers in Kramer et al. (2019; DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.039). Models developed by Peterson (2014: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/167309),Peterson et al. (2016) rely on raw demographic data for golden-winged warblers collected and reported by Peterson (2014; http://hdl.handle.net/11299/167309). Models developed by Kramer (2017; http://hdl.handle.net/11299/188784) and Kramer et al. (in press) use raw demographic data for American woodcock collected and reported by Daly (2014; http://hdl.handle.net/11299/167288).Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/Vermivora chrysopteraScolopax minorreproductive successumbrella species managementdemographyDatasethttps://doi.org/10.13020/znag-tn48