Muñoz, Brenna2019-10-082019-10-082018-05https://hdl.handle.net/11299/208503Professional paper for the fulfillment of the Master of Public Policy degree.Whether welfare programs and social insurance programs should incorporate behavioral stipulations has long been debated throughout history. This debate resurfaces again with the introduction of the opportunity for states to apply to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to incorporate work requirements as a stipulation of eligibility to remain on Medicaid, the joint state-federal health insurance program for low income individuals that is also the largest source of health insurance in the nation. This is the first time in history that CMS has approved work requirements. Previously they have denied requests stating that it did not align with the goals of the Medicaid program (Department of Health and Human Services, 2016). The policy change of Medicaid Work Requirements is an extremely important one due to the extent of potential impact these changes could have, coupled with the scope and reach of the Medicaid program. According to surveys completed by the Kaiser Family Foundation in 2016, there were approximately 24.6 million non-SSI, non-elderly adults receiving Medicaid, with various work statuses and reasons for not working ranging from full and part time employment, caregiving responsibilities, illness, or currently furthering education (KFF, 2018) . This policy has the potential to drastically change how Medicaid recipients receive health care across the country, affecting millions of adults currently relying on Medicaid for their access to health care.enMedicaid Work Requirements Debate Policy AnalysisMedicaid Work Requirements Debate Policy AnalysisThesis or Dissertation