Rios, Joseph ARohloff, Corissa TIhlenfeldt, Samuel DRiegelman, AmyZieffler, Andrew2020-03-182020-03-182020-03-18https://hdl.handle.net/11299/212105Within any scientific field, there is an occasional need to summarize existing research—to not only reflect on current thinking, but to also indicate where the field may be headed. This holds particularly true in the field of educational measurement, where, to date, there has not been a review of general measurement practices in the published literature. To fill this gap, this study conducted a review investigating the author, keyword, methodological, and citation characteristics of empirical studies published in Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice from 2005-2019. Included are the data for the study, keyword, and citation analysis, as well as the code used to conduct these analyses.Attribution 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/educational measurementsystematic reviewbibliometric analysisreproducibilitytransparent reportingDatasethttps://doi.org/10.13020/kxm7-vp82