Damsgard, Erika2020-06-012020-06-012020-05-29https://hdl.handle.net/11299/213854A Plan B Research Project submitted to the faculty of the University of Minnesota by Erika Damsgard in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, May 2020. Advisor: Rick LaCaille.The endorsement of misconceptions, unlike ignorance, may be deep-rooted (Hammer, 1996) and can be challenging to correct (Walter & Murphy, 2018). These erroneous beliefs are prevalent in a variety of areas, including several health domains (e.g., vaccinations; complementary and alternative medicine; diet and exercise; and mental health) and may lead to harmful consequences. Unfortunately, efforts to reduce misconceptions may, in some circumstances, result in backfire effects, whereby incorrect information is misremembered as fact (Lewandowsky et al., 2012). This study aimed to examine the effects of myth debunking posters formatted based upon an actual flu vaccination campaign (CDC, n.d.) and applied to multiple health-related domains. Moreover, a potential backfire effect stemming from presentation format was investigated. Using a 3 (poster condition) x 2 (time of assessment) between subject factorial experimental design, 218 participants completed one of six conditions: (a) Myths and Facts - immediate, (b) Facts Only - immediate, (c) Control - immediate, (d) Myths and Facts - delay, (e) Facts Only - delay, and (f) Control - delay. There was a significant and large main effect for poster condition on overall accurate knowledge, as well as for each targeted domain, in which those in the Myths and Facts and Facts Only conditions accurately identified significantly more information than the Control Condition. No backfire effect for poster format nor illusion of truth effect was detected. Behavioral intentions were less obvious and revealed a more mixed pattern. Overall, the present data suggests that the format used to correct misinformation may be less important than the act of refuting. Future research will benefit from increasing delay periods, increasing variability in populations of myth debunking, expanding response format when measuring misconceptions, and translating increased knowledge to behavioral intentions (and change).enMaster of ArtsUniversity of Minnesota DuluthCollege of Education and Human Service ProfessionsDepartment of PsychologyPlan Bs (project-based master's degrees)Master of Arts in Psychological ScienceClinical Counseling trackAn Experimental Examination of Misconception Corrections Across Health Domains and Potential Backfire EffectScholarly Text or Essay