Hanowski, JoAnn MBlake, John G.Niemi, Gerald JCollins, Patrick T2014-04-012017-04-142014-04-012017-04-141990https://hdl.handle.net/11299/187180SUBCONTRACT NUMBER: EO6595-88-C-011This report summarizes work completed in our study that was designed to isolate effects of electromagnetic (EM) fields produced by extremely low frequency (ELF) antenna systems on bird species breeding in or migrating through Wisconsin. Specifically, we wanted to determine if bird species richness and abundance differed between areas that were close to the antenna and those that were far enough away to be unaffected by the antenna. Characteristics examined included total species richness and abundance, abundances of common bird species, and abundances of birds within selected guilds. Vegetation was measured to identify differences and similarities between control and treatment areas and habitat variables were used in analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to compare abundant bird species’ numbers between control and treatment areas after they were adjusted for habitat differences. We found no consistent patterns that would demonstrate that birds were either attracted to or repelled by EM fields produced by the antenna. Most differences in abundance between control and treatment areas could be attributed to habitat differences (both in ANCOVA and guild analysis). Based on tests of transects paired by habitat similarities, the presence of the antenna ROW may have affected abundance of some bird species in the study areas. Abundance of species related to edges was higher in treatment areas particularly during May and June. Differences in abundance of individuals that require forest interiors between control and treatment areas were not as pronounced. Because we have no before data in Wisconsin, we cannot exclude the possibility that these differences between control and treatment existed before the ROW was cut, such comparisons, however will be possible in Michigan.enBirdsElectromagnetic fieldsExtremely low frequency antenna systemsWisconsinELF communications systemNatural Resources Research InstituteUniversity of Minnesota DuluthTechnical Report