Humphreys, Lloyd G.Drasgow, Fritz2011-06-142011-06-141989Humphreys, Lloyd G & Drasgow, Fritz. (1989). Some comments on the relation between reliability and statistical power. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 419-425. doi:10.1177/014662168901300407doi:10.1177/014662168901300407https://hdl.handle.net/11299/107451Several articles have discussed the curious fact that a difference score with zero reliability can nonetheless allow a powerful test of change. This statistical legerdemain should not be overemphasized for three reasons. First, although the reliability of the difference score may be unrelated to power, the reliabilities of the variables used to create the difference scores are directly related to the power of the test. Second, with what some will regard as additional legerdemain, it is possible to define reliability in the context of a difference score in such a way that power is a direct function of reliability. The third and most serious objection to the conclusion that the reliability of a difference score is unimportant is that the underlying statistical model used in its derivation is rarely appropriate for psychological data. Index terms: control of individual differences, difference scores, reliability, reliability of the marginal distribution, statistical power, within-group reliabilities.enArticle