Kennedy, Krista A.2009-09-172009-09-172009-07https://hdl.handle.net/11299/53663University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. July 2009. Major: Rhetoric and Scientific and Technical Communication. Advisors: Dr. Laura J. Gurak and Dr. John Logie. 1 computer file (PDF); ix, 271 pages. Ill (some col.)Wikipedia is often discussed as the first of its kind: the first massively collaborative, Web-based encyclopedia that belongs to the public domain. While it’s true that wiki technology enables large-scale, distributed collaborations in revolutionary ways, the concept of a collaborative encyclopedia is not new, and neither is the idea that private ownership might not apply to such documents. More than 275 years ago, in the preface to the 1728 edition of his Cyclopædia, Ephraim Chambers mused on the intensely collaborative nature of the volumes he was about to publish. His thoughts were remarkably similar to contemporary intellectual property arguments for Wikipedia, and while the composition processes involved in producing these texts are influenced by the available technologies, they are also unexpectedly similar. This dissertation examines issues of authorial agency in these two texts and shows that the “Author Construct” is not static across eras, genres, or textual technologies. In contrast to traditional considerations of the poetic author, the encyclopedic author demonstrates a different form of authorial agency that operates within strict genre conventions and does not place a premium on originality. This and related variations challenge contemporary ideas concerning the divide between print and digital authorship as well as the notion that new media intellectual property arguments are without historical precedent.en-USAgencyAuthorshipCyclopaediaEncyclopediaIntellectual PropertyWikipediaRhetoric and Scientific and Technical CommunicationThesis or Dissertation