Modeling incorrect responses to multiple-choice items with multilinear formula score theory
Published Date
Publisher
Type
Abstract
Multilinear formula score theory (Levine, 1984,
1985, 1989a, 1989b) provides powerful methods for
addressing important psychological measurement problems.
In this paper, a brief review of multilinear formula
scoring (MFS) is given, with specific emphasis on
estimating option characteristic curves (OCCS). MFS
was used to estimate OCCS for the Arithmetic Reasoning
subtest of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude
Battery. A close match was obtained between empirical
proportions of option selection for examinees in 25
ability intervals and the modeled probabilities of option
selection. In a second analysis, accurately estimated
OCCS were obtained for simulated data. To evaluate
the utility of modeling incorrect responses to the
Arithmetic Reasoning test, the amounts of statistical
information about ability were computed for dichotomous
and polychotomous scorings of the items. Consistent
with earlier studies, moderate gains in information
were obtained for low to slightly above average
abilities. Index terms: item response theory, marginal
maximum likelihood estimation, maximum likelihood
estimation, multilinear formula scoring, option
characteristic curves, polychotomous measurement,
test information function.
Keywords
Description
Related to
item.page.replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding Information
item.page.isbn
DOI identifier
Previously Published Citation
Drasgow, Fritz, Levine, Michael V, Williams, Bruce, McLaughlin, Mary E & et al. (1989). Modeling incorrect responses to multiple-choice items with multilinear formula score theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 285-299. doi:10.1177/014662168901300309
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168901300309
Suggested Citation
Drasgow, Fritz; Levine, Michael V.; Williams, Bruce; McLaughlin, Mary E.; Candell, Gregory L.. (1989). Modeling incorrect responses to multiple-choice items with multilinear formula score theory. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/107366.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.
