Comparison of the nonparametric Mokken Model and parametric IRT models using latent class analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Published Date

Publisher

Abstract

A nonparametric Mokken analysis of test data generally results in the rejection of different items as misfitting than an analysis with a parametric item response theory model. This is due to differences between the methods of analysis employed. Croon (1991) demonstrated that the assumption of "double monotony" of the nonparametric Mokken model can be tested with a latent class analysis using the EM procedure. This allows a comparison of the Mokken model of double monotony and parametric item response models within the same framework. The Mokken model was compared with parametric models using simulated data. It was demonstrated that latent class analysis provides a consistent comparison of item response models. Index terms: EM algorithm, item fit, item response theory, latent class analysis, model comparisons, Mokken model, Rasch model.

Keywords

Description

Related to

item.page.replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding Information

item.page.isbn

DOI identifier

Previously Published Citation

De Gruijter, Dato N. M. (1994). Comparison of the nonparametric Mokken Model and parametric IRT models using latent class analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 27-34. doi:10.1177/014662169401800103

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662169401800103

Suggested Citation

De Gruijter, Dato N. M.. (1994). Comparison of the nonparametric Mokken Model and parametric IRT models using latent class analysis. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/116938.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.